Artificial Empathy and Spiritual Care: Limits of AI-Mediated Compassion in Chaplaincy

This article examines whether artificial intelligence can genuinely participate in practices of care within healthcare settings and what implications this development has for healthcare chaplaincy. Drawing on recent research on artificial empathy, the paper argues that AI can support caregiving practices instrumentally but cannot replace the interpersonal and relational dimensions constitutive of authentic care. The analysis introduces the concept of cognitive safety as a framework for evaluating AI-mediated interactions in contexts of vulnerability. Particular attention is given to empathy, responsibility, practical wisdom, and relational presence as dimensions that remain irreducibly human. The article concludes that chaplaincy should adopt a model of balanced integration in which AI serves as a supportive tool while preserving the centrality of human encounter, spiritual accompaniment, and moral agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Religion and Health
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-026-02811-2
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Empathy and Spiritual Care: Limits of AI-Mediated Compassion in Chaplaincy

Piotr Roszak, Leandro Gaitán
Journal of Religion and Health
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Artificial Empathy and Spiritual Care: Limits of AI-Mediated Compassion in Chaplaincy

Piotr Roszak, Leandro Gaitán
article en

Abstract

This article examines whether artificial intelligence can genuinely participate in practices of care within healthcare settings and what implications this development has for healthcare chaplaincy. Drawing on recent research on artificial empathy, the paper argues that AI can support caregiving practices instrumentally but cannot replace the interpersonal and relational dimensions constitutive of authentic care. The analysis introduces the concept of cognitive safety as a framework for evaluating AI-mediated interactions in contexts of vulnerability. Particular attention is given to empathy, responsibility, practical wisdom, and relational presence as dimensions that remain irreducibly human. The article concludes that chaplaincy should adopt a model of balanced integration in which AI serves as a supportive tool while preserving the centrality of human encounter, spiritual accompaniment, and moral agency.

Journal of Religion and Health
Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Empathy and Spiritual Care: Limits of AI-Mediated Compassion in Chaplaincy — Piotr Roszak, Leandro Gaitán · Journal of Religion and Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS