The politics of civilian suicidality in liberal peacebuilding: Theorising the death drive in International Relations

What makes a peace process a ‘success story’? In Northern Ireland, suicidality rose sharply after the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, even as the peace process became internationally celebrated as a model of conflict settlement. International Relations and peacebuilding scholarship have largely recognised suicide only when it emerges as political self-sacrifice – terrorism, hunger strike and self-immolation – while ‘ordinary’ or everyday suicides are politically and institutionally routed to public health, psychology and sociology and thereby risk being depoliticised. Against this division of labour, the article theorises post-conflict civilian suicidality as a peace governance outcome; namely, an immanent, structural effect of liberal peacebuilding’s logic of containment, stabilisation and political trade-offs. Drawing on Lacanian psychoanalysis, I argue that peace processes can be analysed as death-driven structures. They reproduce themselves by repeating practices that secure negative peace while undercutting positive peace, including healing, reconciliation, integration and care. This self-undermining repetition casts off what I call surplus violence: the remainder generated by the subtraction of negative peace gains from positive peace aspirations. I conceptualise the governance of this remainder as autoktonopolitics, that is, the circulation and distribution through which self-killing is made intelligible, normalised and absorbed as collateral, private or non-political. Empirically, the article draws on interviews in Northern Ireland from 2024 to 2026 to trace technologies of autoktonopower across peace funding, consociational governance, post-paramilitary appeasement and territorialised coercive community control. The article redescribes peace as a question of post-conflict order reproduction, opening a research agenda for Lacanian peacebuilding studies and the libidinal economies of peace processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of International Relations
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661261498604
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of civilian suicidality in liberal peacebuilding: Theorising the death drive in International Relations

Albert Cullell Cano
European Journal of International Relations
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

The politics of civilian suicidality in liberal peacebuilding: Theorising the death drive in International Relations

Albert Cullell Cano
article en

Abstract

What makes a peace process a ‘success story’? In Northern Ireland, suicidality rose sharply after the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, even as the peace process became internationally celebrated as a model of conflict settlement. International Relations and peacebuilding scholarship have largely recognised suicide only when it emerges as political self-sacrifice – terrorism, hunger strike and self-immolation – while ‘ordinary’ or everyday suicides are politically and institutionally routed to public health, psychology and sociology and thereby risk being depoliticised. Against this division of labour, the article theorises post-conflict civilian suicidality as a peace governance outcome; namely, an immanent, structural effect of liberal peacebuilding’s logic of containment, stabilisation and political trade-offs. Drawing on Lacanian psychoanalysis, I argue that peace processes can be analysed as death-driven structures. They reproduce themselves by repeating practices that secure negative peace while undercutting positive peace, including healing, reconciliation, integration and care. This self-undermining repetition casts off what I call surplus violence: the remainder generated by the subtraction of negative peace gains from positive peace aspirations. I conceptualise the governance of this remainder as autoktonopolitics, that is, the circulation and distribution through which self-killing is made intelligible, normalised and absorbed as collateral, private or non-political. Empirically, the article draws on interviews in Northern Ireland from 2024 to 2026 to trace technologies of autoktonopower across peace funding, consociational governance, post-paramilitary appeasement and territorialised coercive community control. The article redescribes peace as a question of post-conflict order reproduction, opening a research agenda for Lacanian peacebuilding studies and the libidinal economies of peace processes.

European Journal of International Relations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The politics of civilian suicidality in liberal peacebuilding: Theorising the death drive in International Relations — Albert Cullell Cano · European Journal of International Relations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS