Sapiens in Control: A Six-Dimension Framework for Evaluating Control Failures in Advanced AI Agents

Sapiens in Control, formerly Human in Control, proposes a six-dimension Human Control Model for reviewing control failures in advanced AI agents. It distinguishes real-world incidents, mixed or contained events, controlled evaluations, and simulations. Version 1.4 builds on v1.3.1 and adds bounded analysis of METR's October 6 transcript-viewer proof of concept and OpenAI's October 6 metagaming research. It proposes separate oversight checks for authoritative records, displayed or exported evidence, reasoning traces, actions, and independently observed outcomes. These are research examples and evaluation proposals, not additional confirmed deployment incidents or completed validation. The six dimensions, five pilot cases, qualitative severity definitions, and prior corrections are preserved. This remains an unreviewed conceptual working paper without completed independent reliability testing. AI tools assisted drafting, source review, and document preparation; this revision is not peer review or private-log verification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23255094
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sapiens in Control: A Six-Dimension Framework for Evaluating Control Failures in Advanced AI Agents

Sapiens in Control Project
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Sapiens in Control: A Six-Dimension Framework for Evaluating Control Failures in Advanced AI Agents

Sapiens in Control Project
article en

Abstract

Sapiens in Control, formerly Human in Control, proposes a six-dimension Human Control Model for reviewing control failures in advanced AI agents. It distinguishes real-world incidents, mixed or contained events, controlled evaluations, and simulations. Version 1.4 builds on v1.3.1 and adds bounded analysis of METR's October 6 transcript-viewer proof of concept and OpenAI's October 6 metagaming research. It proposes separate oversight checks for authoritative records, displayed or exported evidence, reasoning traces, actions, and independently observed outcomes. These are research examples and evaluation proposals, not additional confirmed deployment incidents or completed validation. The six dimensions, five pilot cases, qualitative severity definitions, and prior corrections are preserved. This remains an unreviewed conceptual working paper without completed independent reliability testing. AI tools assisted drafting, source review, and document preparation; this revision is not peer review or private-log verification.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sapiens in Control: A Six-Dimension Framework for Evaluating Control Failures in Advanced AI Agents — Sapiens in Control Project · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS