Warehouse logistics and task switching theory revisited: asymmetric height switching costs in order picking systems

Purpose This study investigates the impact of pick location height switching on task performance time in manual order picking systems. Drawing on task switching theory, we examine whether switching between ground- and chest-level pick locations increases task performance time, whether switching costs are asymmetric, and whether item weight strengthens possible differences between ground-to-chest and chest-to-ground switches. Design/methodology/approach We adopt a two-stage approach that combines internal validity and operational generalizability. First, a controlled eye-tracking experiment simulates a simplified order picking scenario to explore the cognitive mechanisms underlying visual search when repeating versus switching pick location heights. Second, we analyze 3,537,973 pick location visits from a German grocery retail warehouse to test the effects of pick location height switching in a real-world operational environment with professional order pickers. Findings The eye-tracking experiment provides mechanism-oriented evidence that switching between pick location heights increases visual search time and reorientation demands under controlled conditions. The archival field study complements these behavioral insights by showing that height switching is associated with longer task performance time. It further shows that switching costs depend on direction, with ground-to-chest switches being more time-consuming than chest-to ground switches. This directional difference becomes more pronounced as item weight increases. Practical implications The findings suggest that warehouse managers should consider not only the frequency but also the direction of height switches when designing picking sequences. Batching and routing algorithms could incorporate switching costs as a weighted parameter, with particular attention to ground-to-chest switches involving heavier items. However, reducing height switches should be balanced against ergonomic risks, as long sequences of ground-level picks may increase repetitive bending and musculoskeletal strain. Originality/value This study provides the first empirical evidence on pick location height switching in warehouse operations and extends task switching theory to a new operational context. By combining mechanism-oriented eye-tracking evidence with large-scale field data, we show that height switching is associated with asymmetric switching costs and provide insights into the cognitive and motor reorientation processes that may underlie these effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-11-2025-0602
Primary Topic
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Warehouse logistics and task switching theory revisited: asymmetric height switching costs in order picking systems

Christoph H. Glock, Matthias Klumpp, Dominic Loske, Jonas Koreis et al.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
article

Warehouse logistics and task switching theory revisited: asymmetric height switching costs in order picking systems

Christoph H. Glock, Matthias Klumpp, Dominic Loske, Jonas Koreis, Ting Zheng
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the impact of pick location height switching on task performance time in manual order picking systems. Drawing on task switching theory, we examine whether switching between ground- and chest-level pick locations increases task performance time, whether switching costs are asymmetric, and whether item weight strengthens possible differences between ground-to-chest and chest-to-ground switches. Design/methodology/approach We adopt a two-stage approach that combines internal validity and operational generalizability. First, a controlled eye-tracking experiment simulates a simplified order picking scenario to explore the cognitive mechanisms underlying visual search when repeating versus switching pick location heights. Second, we analyze 3,537,973 pick location visits from a German grocery retail warehouse to test the effects of pick location height switching in a real-world operational environment with professional order pickers. Findings The eye-tracking experiment provides mechanism-oriented evidence that switching between pick location heights increases visual search time and reorientation demands under controlled conditions. The archival field study complements these behavioral insights by showing that height switching is associated with longer task performance time. It further shows that switching costs depend on direction, with ground-to-chest switches being more time-consuming than chest-to ground switches. This directional difference becomes more pronounced as item weight increases. Practical implications The findings suggest that warehouse managers should consider not only the frequency but also the direction of height switches when designing picking sequences. Batching and routing algorithms could incorporate switching costs as a weighted parameter, with particular attention to ground-to-chest switches involving heavier items. However, reducing height switches should be balanced against ergonomic risks, as long sequences of ground-level picks may increase repetitive bending and musculoskeletal strain. Originality/value This study provides the first empirical evidence on pick location height switching in warehouse operations and extends task switching theory to a new operational context. By combining mechanism-oriented eye-tracking evidence with large-scale field data, we show that height switching is associated with asymmetric switching costs and provide insights into the cognitive and motor reorientation processes that may underlie these effects.

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Hochschule Bremen (DE), University of Bremen (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.