Crack Orientation From Eddy Current Signals: Deep Learning Coupled With Fracture Mechanics

ABSTRACT Crack orientation governs how the crack‐tip field is partitioned between fracture modes, yet automated nondestructive testing (NDT) rarely resolves it. This work couples eddy current testing (ECT), a one‐dimensional convolutional neural network (1D‐CNN) and linear elastic fracture mechanics. A finite element model of a differential ECT probe scanning a surface crack in an S355 steel plate provides impedance signatures for orientations between 0° and 180°; the real part, imaginary part, and magnitude of ΔZ train the network, which resolves orientation over 10 classes with 87.72% accuracy, 2.85° mean absolute error, and 3.41° root mean square error. Predicted angles feed a Raju–Newman stress intensity factor and a Paris‐law integration of remaining life. Because the induced currents run transverse to the service stress, ECT amplitude and crack driving force are anticorrelated: The strongest signals come from the least critical cracks. Amplitude‐based triage is therefore unsafe, and orientation‐resolved assessment is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.70483
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crack Orientation From Eddy Current Signals: Deep Learning Coupled With Fracture Mechanics

Salaheddine Harzallah
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Crack Orientation From Eddy Current Signals: Deep Learning Coupled With Fracture Mechanics

Salaheddine Harzallah
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Crack orientation governs how the crack‐tip field is partitioned between fracture modes, yet automated nondestructive testing (NDT) rarely resolves it. This work couples eddy current testing (ECT), a one‐dimensional convolutional neural network (1D‐CNN) and linear elastic fracture mechanics. A finite element model of a differential ECT probe scanning a surface crack in an S355 steel plate provides impedance signatures for orientations between 0° and 180°; the real part, imaginary part, and magnitude of ΔZ train the network, which resolves orientation over 10 classes with 87.72% accuracy, 2.85° mean absolute error, and 3.41° root mean square error. Predicted angles feed a Raju–Newman stress intensity factor and a Paris‐law integration of remaining life. Because the induced currents run transverse to the service stress, ECT amplitude and crack driving force are anticorrelated: The strongest signals come from the least critical cracks. Amplitude‐based triage is therefore unsafe, and orientation‐resolved assessment is required.

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Ziane Achour University of Djelfa (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.