Legitimacy, rebellion, and the sanctification of violence: Rethinking international law, theology, and human rights in Africa's armed conflicts

War and violence in Africa's postcolonial conflicts are fundamentally shaped by contested claims of legitimacy across law, politics, and religion. This article argues that the prohibition on the use of force under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter has operated asymmetrically, privileging state authority while marginalizing internal struggles for justice. Although Article 1(4) of Additional Protocol I recognized wars of national liberation, it entrenched hierarchies that legitimize some forms of violence while delegitimizing others. In parallel, religious narratives have been mobilized to both sanctify resistance and justify coercion by state and non-state actors. Drawing on African philosophical traditions, particularly ubuntu, and the African human rights framework, the article advances a reconstructive vision of legitimacy grounded in relational dignity, responsibility, and the preservation of life, challenging the enduring sanctification of violence in law and theology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02653788261485794
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legitimacy, rebellion, and the sanctification of violence: Rethinking international law, theology, and human rights in Africa's armed conflicts

Joshua Joseph Niyo
Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies
International Law and Human Rights
article

Legitimacy, rebellion, and the sanctification of violence: Rethinking international law, theology, and human rights in Africa's armed conflicts

Joshua Joseph Niyo
article en

Abstract

War and violence in Africa's postcolonial conflicts are fundamentally shaped by contested claims of legitimacy across law, politics, and religion. This article argues that the prohibition on the use of force under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter has operated asymmetrically, privileging state authority while marginalizing internal struggles for justice. Although Article 1(4) of Additional Protocol I recognized wars of national liberation, it entrenched hierarchies that legitimize some forms of violence while delegitimizing others. In parallel, religious narratives have been mobilized to both sanctify resistance and justify coercion by state and non-state actors. Drawing on African philosophical traditions, particularly ubuntu, and the African human rights framework, the article advances a reconstructive vision of legitimacy grounded in relational dignity, responsibility, and the preservation of life, challenging the enduring sanctification of violence in law and theology.

Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legitimacy, rebellion, and the sanctification of violence: Rethinking international law, theology, and human rights in Africa's armed conflicts — Joshua Joseph Niyo · Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS