Accessibility and Decision-Supportive Quality of Benign Breast Disease Articles on Chinese Hospital WeChat Public Accounts: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is critical for managing clinically ambiguous conditions such as benign breast disease (BBD), requiring reliable health information. In China, WeChat public accounts (WPAs) run by hospitals serve as a major health information channel, yet their quality remains unevaluated. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the quality of BBD-related articles on hospital WPAs in China. Methods Using a multistage stratified random sampling approach, we conducted a nationwide survey examining the quality of articles published from January 2020 to November 2024. The articles were evaluated for accessibility (readability, image quality, and user-friendliness) and SDM readiness (credibility, balance, and decision relevance) using validated instruments and content analysis. Results Among 276,617 articles from 158 sampled hospitals, 464 were related to BBD. Accessibility was generally good: 72.4% (336/464) were written at a junior high school reading level. Visual presentation was acceptable, although only 10.2% (42/410) had complete image labeling. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) scores showed moderate understandability (mean 73.6%, SD 17.3%) but limited actionability (mean 50%, SD 23.2%). For SDM readiness, the mean Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) score was 14.9 (SD 4.7) out of 28, with treatment-related articles scoring lower than prevention-related articles ( P <.001). In the balance evaluation, using Brief DISCERN, 84.3% (182/216) of articles were below the high-quality threshold, often lacking information on treatment risks and quality-of-life impacts. Decision relevance revealed variability in surgical recommendations, especially regarding excision criteria and pregnancy-related guidance. Conclusions WPA articles on BBD showed good accessibility but substantial gaps in SDM support, particularly in information balance and decision relevance. Standardized guidelines and quality improvements are needed to enhance patient-centered online health services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Medical Informatics
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/95994
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accessibility and Decision-Supportive Quality of Benign Breast Disease Articles on Chinese Hospital WeChat Public Accounts: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

W Zhou, Hongfan Yu, Qiuling Shi, Lichi Ke et al.
JMIR Medical Informatics
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Accessibility and Decision-Supportive Quality of Benign Breast Disease Articles on Chinese Hospital WeChat Public Accounts: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

W Zhou, Hongfan Yu, Qiuling Shi, Lichi Ke, DeHua Hu, Wei Xu, Lei Cheng, Xing Wei, Min Li, Shi Wang, Wenlin Wu, Zhiliang Zhang, Chenxi He, Jin Bai, Jing Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is critical for managing clinically ambiguous conditions such as benign breast disease (BBD), requiring reliable health information. In China, WeChat public accounts (WPAs) run by hospitals serve as a major health information channel, yet their quality remains unevaluated. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the quality of BBD-related articles on hospital WPAs in China. Methods Using a multistage stratified random sampling approach, we conducted a nationwide survey examining the quality of articles published from January 2020 to November 2024. The articles were evaluated for accessibility (readability, image quality, and user-friendliness) and SDM readiness (credibility, balance, and decision relevance) using validated instruments and content analysis. Results Among 276,617 articles from 158 sampled hospitals, 464 were related to BBD. Accessibility was generally good: 72.4% (336/464) were written at a junior high school reading level. Visual presentation was acceptable, although only 10.2% (42/410) had complete image labeling. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) scores showed moderate understandability (mean 73.6%, SD 17.3%) but limited actionability (mean 50%, SD 23.2%). For SDM readiness, the mean Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) score was 14.9 (SD 4.7) out of 28, with treatment-related articles scoring lower than prevention-related articles ( P <.001). In the balance evaluation, using Brief DISCERN, 84.3% (182/216) of articles were below the high-quality threshold, often lacking information on treatment risks and quality-of-life impacts. Decision relevance revealed variability in surgical recommendations, especially regarding excision criteria and pregnancy-related guidance. Conclusions WPA articles on BBD showed good accessibility but substantial gaps in SDM support, particularly in information balance and decision relevance. Standardized guidelines and quality improvements are needed to enhance patient-centered online health services.

JMIR Medical InformaticsVol. 14
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.