Unraveling the ScCO2–Induced Mineral-Pore-Mechanics Interplay in Coal and Caprock with Integrated Nanoindentation, SEM-EDS, and BET Characterization

Abstract The long-term security of geological carbon storage (GCS) in coal seams requires a predictive understanding of ScCO2 (supercritical carbon dioxide)-induced alterations across the reservoir–caprock system. This study quantifies the differential response of coal, sandstone, and shale to ScCO2 exposure through integrated nanoindentation, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. Coal undergoes the most severe weakening, quantified by a 42.6% reduction in reduced elastic modulus (from 3.317 ± 0.155 GPa to 1.903 ± 0.511 GPa) and a 61.8% reduction in hardness (from 0.403 ± 0.043 GPa to 0.154 ± 0.058 GPa) after 5-day exposure. Sandstone exhibits moderate, localized weakening, while siliceous shale remains mechanically stable. This divergence stems from lithology-controlled geochemical pathways. In coal, the preferential dissolution of carbonate minerals (calcite dropping by 27.7%) by in situ formed carbonic acid drives a profound pore-structure transformation, characterized by a 69.9% increase in pore volume and a 30.1% increase in average pore diameter, accompanied by a 32.1% decrease in specific surface area (SSA) after 5-day exposure. Concurrently, deformation mechanism analysis reveals that coal transitions toward more heterogeneous and plasticity-dominated behavior, with both elastic recovery and creep displacement increasing significantly after treatment. In contrast, the inert silicate-dominated frameworks of sandstone and shale impart pronounced chemical resistance, resulting in minimal pore alteration and mechanical change─though sandstone exhibits localized, unpredictable creep responses at grain boundaries. Our findings suggest that, under the tested conditions, the primary integrity risk may shift from the caprock to the coal reservoir, and raise the hypothesis that differential deformation at coal-rock interfaces could induce shear failure─an implication requiring validation through future shear strength and coupled geomechanical modeling. These findings provide a mechanistic, data-driven framework for stability assessment and injection strategy design in CO2 storage while enhancing coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c01988
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling the ScCO2–Induced Mineral-Pore-Mechanics Interplay in Coal and Caprock with Integrated Nanoindentation, SEM-EDS, and BET Characterization

Hao Xu, Hengyi He, Peng Liu, Wei Guang Zhao et al.
Energy & Fuels
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Unraveling the ScCO2–Induced Mineral-Pore-Mechanics Interplay in Coal and Caprock with Integrated Nanoindentation, SEM-EDS, and BET Characterization

Hao Xu, Hengyi He, Peng Liu, Wei Guang Zhao, Wanjun Chen, Ang Liu, Jingtao Yang, Baisheng Nie
article en

Abstract

Abstract The long-term security of geological carbon storage (GCS) in coal seams requires a predictive understanding of ScCO2 (supercritical carbon dioxide)-induced alterations across the reservoir–caprock system. This study quantifies the differential response of coal, sandstone, and shale to ScCO2 exposure through integrated nanoindentation, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. Coal undergoes the most severe weakening, quantified by a 42.6% reduction in reduced elastic modulus (from 3.317 ± 0.155 GPa to 1.903 ± 0.511 GPa) and a 61.8% reduction in hardness (from 0.403 ± 0.043 GPa to 0.154 ± 0.058 GPa) after 5-day exposure. Sandstone exhibits moderate, localized weakening, while siliceous shale remains mechanically stable. This divergence stems from lithology-controlled geochemical pathways. In coal, the preferential dissolution of carbonate minerals (calcite dropping by 27.7%) by in situ formed carbonic acid drives a profound pore-structure transformation, characterized by a 69.9% increase in pore volume and a 30.1% increase in average pore diameter, accompanied by a 32.1% decrease in specific surface area (SSA) after 5-day exposure. Concurrently, deformation mechanism analysis reveals that coal transitions toward more heterogeneous and plasticity-dominated behavior, with both elastic recovery and creep displacement increasing significantly after treatment. In contrast, the inert silicate-dominated frameworks of sandstone and shale impart pronounced chemical resistance, resulting in minimal pore alteration and mechanical change─though sandstone exhibits localized, unpredictable creep responses at grain boundaries. Our findings suggest that, under the tested conditions, the primary integrity risk may shift from the caprock to the coal reservoir, and raise the hypothesis that differential deformation at coal-rock interfaces could induce shear failure─an implication requiring validation through future shear strength and coupled geomechanical modeling. These findings provide a mechanistic, data-driven framework for stability assessment and injection strategy design in CO2 storage while enhancing coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM).

Energy & Fuels
University of Nevada, Reno (US), Chongqing University (CN), Chengdu University of Technology (CN), China University of Mining and Technology - Beijing
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.