Financial Toxicity in Plastic Surgery

Introduction: Financial toxicity (FT) describes the physical, psychosocial, and financial burden of health care–related costs on patients’ well-being. Plastic surgery patients may be susceptible to FT due to high procedure and adjunct therapy costs. Despite these risks, FT resulting from plastic and reconstructive surgery remains unclear. This scoping review assessed the prevalence and impact of FT on plastic surgery patients. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from inception through February 17, 2026, for studies evaluating FT in plastic surgery. At least 2 reviewers independently screened records and performed data extraction. Findings were synthesized narratively. Reporting followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–Extension for Scoping Reviews guidance. Results: Of the 4213 studies screened, 14 studies were included in the review. All included studies incorporated cross-sectional survey data, most commonly evaluating breast reconstruction (n = 8, 57.14%). Greater FT was most consistently associated with socioeconomic vulnerability, including lower household income and less favorable insurance or financial circumstances, while treatment-related associations varied across clinical contexts. FT was characterized by out-of-pocket expenses, financial decline, debt, employment-related consequences, and reductions in household spending. Greater FT was also associated with poorer psychosocial well-being, quality of life, and symptom burden. Coping behaviors included use of savings or credit, reductions in essential and nonessential spending, and changes in health care use or treatment timing. Conclusion: FT among patients receiving plastic surgical care extended beyond direct out-of-pocket expenses to broader financial and psychosocial consequences. Socioeconomic vulnerability was most consistently associated with greater FT, while treatment-related associations varied across clinical contexts. Future prospective studies should evaluate financial-needs screening, cost-informed counseling, and financial navigation as potential strategies to reduce FT and improve cost understanding and treatment decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004914
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial Toxicity in Plastic Surgery

김지민, Samantha Kaplan, Josip Plascevic, Sarah Ludington et al.
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Financial Toxicity in Plastic Surgery

김지민, Samantha Kaplan, Josip Plascevic, Sarah Ludington, Joey Liang, Ash Patel, Kristen Rezak
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Financial toxicity (FT) describes the physical, psychosocial, and financial burden of health care–related costs on patients’ well-being. Plastic surgery patients may be susceptible to FT due to high procedure and adjunct therapy costs. Despite these risks, FT resulting from plastic and reconstructive surgery remains unclear. This scoping review assessed the prevalence and impact of FT on plastic surgery patients. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from inception through February 17, 2026, for studies evaluating FT in plastic surgery. At least 2 reviewers independently screened records and performed data extraction. Findings were synthesized narratively. Reporting followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–Extension for Scoping Reviews guidance. Results: Of the 4213 studies screened, 14 studies were included in the review. All included studies incorporated cross-sectional survey data, most commonly evaluating breast reconstruction (n = 8, 57.14%). Greater FT was most consistently associated with socioeconomic vulnerability, including lower household income and less favorable insurance or financial circumstances, while treatment-related associations varied across clinical contexts. FT was characterized by out-of-pocket expenses, financial decline, debt, employment-related consequences, and reductions in household spending. Greater FT was also associated with poorer psychosocial well-being, quality of life, and symptom burden. Coping behaviors included use of savings or credit, reductions in essential and nonessential spending, and changes in health care use or treatment timing. Conclusion: FT among patients receiving plastic surgical care extended beyond direct out-of-pocket expenses to broader financial and psychosocial consequences. Socioeconomic vulnerability was most consistently associated with greater FT, while treatment-related associations varied across clinical contexts. Future prospective studies should evaluate financial-needs screening, cost-informed counseling, and financial navigation as potential strategies to reduce FT and improve cost understanding and treatment decision-making.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
Duke University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.