‘This is not what science is’: Researchers’ perspectives on doing decolonial research in Flemish (Belgian) higher education

Despite the sociological attention paid to the role of racism in producing racial inequalities in universities, few studies have examined epistemic coloniality and marginalization at the level of social knowledge within academia. Foregrounding the university context, where anti-colonial knowledge is simultaneously marginalized, this article asks what the possibilities are for decolonial critiques of knowledge within universities. Based on interviews with racialized PhD researchers of colour, this study examines the possibilities and challenges of conducting decolonial research within a university context. We argue that the epistemic frameworks of social sciences are intrinsically racialized, fostering exclusionary modes of thought and practices that align with racial and socio-geographical lines. Second, this study reveals how dominant conceptions of scientific validity and neutrality in social sciences sustain the epistemic status quo, contributing to ‘epistemic coloniality’ by invalidating decolonial researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385261484547
Primary Topic
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘This is not what science is’: Researchers’ perspectives on doing decolonial research in Flemish (Belgian) higher education

Peter A. J. Stevens, Bart Van de Putte, Elif Lootens
Sociology
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
article

‘This is not what science is’: Researchers’ perspectives on doing decolonial research in Flemish (Belgian) higher education

Peter A. J. Stevens, Bart Van de Putte, Elif Lootens
article en

Abstract

Despite the sociological attention paid to the role of racism in producing racial inequalities in universities, few studies have examined epistemic coloniality and marginalization at the level of social knowledge within academia. Foregrounding the university context, where anti-colonial knowledge is simultaneously marginalized, this article asks what the possibilities are for decolonial critiques of knowledge within universities. Based on interviews with racialized PhD researchers of colour, this study examines the possibilities and challenges of conducting decolonial research within a university context. We argue that the epistemic frameworks of social sciences are intrinsically racialized, fostering exclusionary modes of thought and practices that align with racial and socio-geographical lines. Second, this study reveals how dominant conceptions of scientific validity and neutrality in social sciences sustain the epistemic status quo, contributing to ‘epistemic coloniality’ by invalidating decolonial researchers.

Sociology
Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘This is not what science is’: Researchers’ perspectives on doing decolonial research in Flemish (Belgian) higher education — Peter A. J. Stevens, Bart Van de Putte, et al. · Sociology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS