Tail-Risk-Aware Model Predictive Control for Hypoglycemia Mitigation in Automated Insulin Delivery

Background: Automated insulin delivery must maintain glycemic control despite partial observability, physiological heterogeneity, and sensing and actuation errors. Cohort-average metrics may nevertheless conceal hypoglycemia in vulnerable virtual patients. Methods: We developed a tail-risk-aware model predictive control framework that combines a Transformer-based latent world model, unguided iterative cross-entropy method planning over perturbed rollouts, and a deterministic Safety Layer that projects insulin actions onto programmed bounds. Reinforcement-learning-guided proposal sampling was evaluated separately as an exploratory search variant. The primary controller was evaluated in Simglucose using 10 virtual patients, three random seeds, and five prespecified operating conditions. Results: Under nominal conditions, it achieved a cohort-average time in range (TIR) of 77.6% and time below range (TBR) of 3.8%, but worst-k TBR was 11.0% and increased to 37.4% under 5% random CGM missingness. In the risk-objective ablation, combining variance penalization with TailMean increased TIR by 2.8 percentage points and reduced cohort-average and worst-k TBR by 2.3 and 7.4 percentage points, respectively, relative to mean-only planning. The Safety Layer modified every proposed action in the analyzed run, indicating strong dependence on the programmed bounds. Conclusions: These results show that average target attainment can coexist with substantial patient-level risk. They support tail-aware evaluation and identify patient-specific safeguards as a priority for future validation, but do not establish clinical safety or efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metabolites
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16100759
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tail-Risk-Aware Model Predictive Control for Hypoglycemia Mitigation in Automated Insulin Delivery

Tianyi Zang, Kaiyuan Zhang, Shuo Kang, Hexing Guo et al.
Metabolites
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Tail-Risk-Aware Model Predictive Control for Hypoglycemia Mitigation in Automated Insulin Delivery

Tianyi Zang, Kaiyuan Zhang, Shuo Kang, Hexing Guo, Congyu Han, Shuji Jing, Chunrui Wang, Yanli Zhao
article en

Abstract

Background: Automated insulin delivery must maintain glycemic control despite partial observability, physiological heterogeneity, and sensing and actuation errors. Cohort-average metrics may nevertheless conceal hypoglycemia in vulnerable virtual patients. Methods: We developed a tail-risk-aware model predictive control framework that combines a Transformer-based latent world model, unguided iterative cross-entropy method planning over perturbed rollouts, and a deterministic Safety Layer that projects insulin actions onto programmed bounds. Reinforcement-learning-guided proposal sampling was evaluated separately as an exploratory search variant. The primary controller was evaluated in Simglucose using 10 virtual patients, three random seeds, and five prespecified operating conditions. Results: Under nominal conditions, it achieved a cohort-average time in range (TIR) of 77.6% and time below range (TBR) of 3.8%, but worst-k TBR was 11.0% and increased to 37.4% under 5% random CGM missingness. In the risk-objective ablation, combining variance penalization with TailMean increased TIR by 2.8 percentage points and reduced cohort-average and worst-k TBR by 2.3 and 7.4 percentage points, respectively, relative to mean-only planning. The Safety Layer modified every proposed action in the analyzed run, indicating strong dependence on the programmed bounds. Conclusions: These results show that average target attainment can coexist with substantial patient-level risk. They support tail-aware evaluation and identify patient-specific safeguards as a priority for future validation, but do not establish clinical safety or efficacy.

MetabolitesVol. 16(10)
Qinghai University (CN), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.