Everyday Encounters With Public Authority: Healthcare Experiences and Differentiated Institutional Trust Across Europe

ABSTRACT Citizens encounter public authority not only through elections and policy debates but also through routine interactions with public services. This article examines how recent healthcare encounters are associated with trust in government, parliament and local authorities, and whether these relationships are organised through broader evaluations of service performance. Using the 2016 European Quality of Life Survey, the analysis compares recent users of general‐practitioner and hospital or specialist services across the EU28. Country fixed‐effects models distinguish the total association of encounter quality with institutional trust from the component linked to general service evaluation and the residual association with the concrete encounter. Better healthcare experiences are associated with greater trust in all three institutions. For government and parliament, most of this relationship is connected to broader judgements of service performance, and the residual encounter coefficients are small. For local authorities, the residual coefficients are substantially larger, although stringent controls for broader place‐based and institutional evaluations reduce their magnitude, particularly for hospital care. Cross‐national meta‐regressions further show that the local pattern is not systematically stronger where healthcare spending is more decentralised. The findings therefore point to institutionally differentiated pathways through which ordinary service encounters become politically meaningful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Social Science Journal
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.70074
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Everyday Encounters With Public Authority: Healthcare Experiences and Differentiated Institutional Trust Across Europe

Pasquale Colloca
International Social Science Journal
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Everyday Encounters With Public Authority: Healthcare Experiences and Differentiated Institutional Trust Across Europe

Pasquale Colloca
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Citizens encounter public authority not only through elections and policy debates but also through routine interactions with public services. This article examines how recent healthcare encounters are associated with trust in government, parliament and local authorities, and whether these relationships are organised through broader evaluations of service performance. Using the 2016 European Quality of Life Survey, the analysis compares recent users of general‐practitioner and hospital or specialist services across the EU28. Country fixed‐effects models distinguish the total association of encounter quality with institutional trust from the component linked to general service evaluation and the residual association with the concrete encounter. Better healthcare experiences are associated with greater trust in all three institutions. For government and parliament, most of this relationship is connected to broader judgements of service performance, and the residual encounter coefficients are small. For local authorities, the residual coefficients are substantially larger, although stringent controls for broader place‐based and institutional evaluations reduce their magnitude, particularly for hospital care. Cross‐national meta‐regressions further show that the local pattern is not systematically stronger where healthcare spending is more decentralised. The findings therefore point to institutionally differentiated pathways through which ordinary service encounters become politically meaningful.

International Social Science Journal
University of Bologna (IT)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.