Compression–separation history bonded-contact model for improved UCS–BTS matching in DEM of brittle rock

Traditional bonded-particle models in the discrete element method often struggle to reproduce both unconfined compressive strength and Brazilian tensile splitting strength of brittle rock using a single micro-parameter set, because the same bond formulation is commonly applied to closure-dominated and opening-dominated loading paths. This study proposes a compression–separation history bonded-contact model to address this limitation. The model introduces closure-driven stiffness hardening to represent progressive microcrack closure under compression, together with a history-dependent damage rule that degrades normal and tangential bond strengths more strongly under opening-dominated kinematics. A two-stage surrogate-assisted calibration procedure is then used to identify the model parameters from laboratory UCS and BTS data. The framework is validated against three matched sandstone specimen groups spanning a wide experimental UCS-to-BTS ratio range. Quasi-static acceleration is assessed using an inertial number criterion and a rate-insensitivity check, enabling loading rate increases of up to 10 5 for UCS and 10 4 for BTS. Across all groups, the surrogate predicts DEM peak responses with errors below 5%, and the final calibrated simulations reproduce the experimental UCS-to-BTS ratios with absolute relative errors below 10%. The results show that the proposed bonded-contact model improves simultaneous DEM representation of compressive and tensile rock strength while providing an efficient and reproducible calibration framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2026.106748
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compression–separation history bonded-contact model for improved UCS–BTS matching in DEM of brittle rock

Jipei Chen, Jon Roberts, David Hastie
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Compression–separation history bonded-contact model for improved UCS–BTS matching in DEM of brittle rock

Jipei Chen, Jon Roberts, David Hastie
article en

Abstract

Traditional bonded-particle models in the discrete element method often struggle to reproduce both unconfined compressive strength and Brazilian tensile splitting strength of brittle rock using a single micro-parameter set, because the same bond formulation is commonly applied to closure-dominated and opening-dominated loading paths. This study proposes a compression–separation history bonded-contact model to address this limitation. The model introduces closure-driven stiffness hardening to represent progressive microcrack closure under compression, together with a history-dependent damage rule that degrades normal and tangential bond strengths more strongly under opening-dominated kinematics. A two-stage surrogate-assisted calibration procedure is then used to identify the model parameters from laboratory UCS and BTS data. The framework is validated against three matched sandstone specimen groups spanning a wide experimental UCS-to-BTS ratio range. Quasi-static acceleration is assessed using an inertial number criterion and a rate-insensitivity check, enabling loading rate increases of up to 10 5 for UCS and 10 4 for BTS. Across all groups, the surrogate predicts DEM peak responses with errors below 5%, and the final calibrated simulations reproduce the experimental UCS-to-BTS ratios with absolute relative errors below 10%. The results show that the proposed bonded-contact model improves simultaneous DEM representation of compressive and tensile rock strength while providing an efficient and reproducible calibration framework.

International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining SciencesVol. 208
University of Wollongong (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Compression–separation history bonded-contact model for improved UCS–BTS matching in DEM of brittle rock — Jipei Chen, Jon Roberts, et al. · International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS