Invisible but Impactful: Understanding the Dynamics and Effects of Gender Microaggressions Through Workers’ Eyes

Subtle and often ambiguous forms of gender-based bias continue to shape everyday workplace interactions, influencing how individuals are perceived, evaluated, and treated. This study examines gender microaggressions (GMAs), defined as subtle, often ambiguous verbal, behavioral, or environmental expressions of gender-based bias. These pervasive yet frequently overlooked dynamics are explored in terms of their directionality, multi-level effects, and how individuals interpret and respond to them within organizational hierarchies. Using a qualitative design, 47 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Italian workers across roles and sectors. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, complemented by T-Lab co-occurrence analysis to identify recurring patterns in perceived effects and reactions. Participants predominantly perceived GMAs as targeting women and being enacted by men, reflecting perceived gendered power asymmetries. Participants reported cascading negative effects, including psychological distress, reduced motivation, impaired workplace relationships, and perceived effects extending to broader organizational functioning. Reactions were highly context-dependent, with non-response emerging as common due to ambiguity and power constraints, while participants also described more assertive responses following repeated experiences. Overall, GMAs emerge as systemic, multi-level phenomena that undermine individual well-being and organizational functioning, highlighting the need for structural and cultural interventions to foster more inclusive workplaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16101864
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invisible but Impactful: Understanding the Dynamics and Effects of Gender Microaggressions Through Workers’ Eyes

Martina Pansini, Paula Benevene, Ilaria Buonomo, Francesco D’Anna
Behavioral Sciences
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Invisible but Impactful: Understanding the Dynamics and Effects of Gender Microaggressions Through Workers’ Eyes

Martina Pansini, Paula Benevene, Ilaria Buonomo, Francesco D’Anna
article en

Abstract

Subtle and often ambiguous forms of gender-based bias continue to shape everyday workplace interactions, influencing how individuals are perceived, evaluated, and treated. This study examines gender microaggressions (GMAs), defined as subtle, often ambiguous verbal, behavioral, or environmental expressions of gender-based bias. These pervasive yet frequently overlooked dynamics are explored in terms of their directionality, multi-level effects, and how individuals interpret and respond to them within organizational hierarchies. Using a qualitative design, 47 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Italian workers across roles and sectors. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, complemented by T-Lab co-occurrence analysis to identify recurring patterns in perceived effects and reactions. Participants predominantly perceived GMAs as targeting women and being enacted by men, reflecting perceived gendered power asymmetries. Participants reported cascading negative effects, including psychological distress, reduced motivation, impaired workplace relationships, and perceived effects extending to broader organizational functioning. Reactions were highly context-dependent, with non-response emerging as common due to ambiguity and power constraints, while participants also described more assertive responses following repeated experiences. Overall, GMAs emerge as systemic, multi-level phenomena that undermine individual well-being and organizational functioning, highlighting the need for structural and cultural interventions to foster more inclusive workplaces.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(10)
Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT), Università degli Studi eCampus (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.