A comprehensive mixed-methods investigation of role conflict among female secondary school teachers across locales

The present study is needed to examine the extent and nature of role conflict among female secondary school teachers on the basis of locale in order to better understand its impact on their professional effectiveness and personal well-being. The study was conducted on female secondary school teachers using a Mixed Method Design. A stratified sampling technique was employed to collect quantitative data from the participants, while for the qualitative component, 20 teachers were selected purposively. The quantitative sample comprised 254 urban and 196 rural female secondary school teachers, selected randomly. The study aimed to compare the two groups in terms of level of role conflict based on locale. Additionally, opinions from Head Teachers were gathered to supplement the findings. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were carried out, including Mean, Standard Deviation, t-test, and thematic analysis for the qualitative data. The results revealed that 82% of respondents reported low role conflict, whereas 18% experienced moderate to high levels. The study also revealed that urban female secondary school teachers experience a higher level of role conflict compared to their rural counterparts. Moreover, the results highlight the importance of a congenial school atmosphere and effective workload management in mitigating role conflict among female teachers. Therefore, the study suggests that creating an encouraging and supportive school environment can significantly contribute to the mental well-being and professional satisfaction of female secondary school teachers.