Water Resources Management Risks Across Kazakhstan’s Transboundary Basins: A Multi-Criteria Assessment (Zhaiyk-Caspian, Shu-Talas, and Balkhash-Alakol Basins)

Water management in Kazakhstan’s arid basins, which depend on transboundary rivers, faces intense pressure from climate variability, anthropogenic load, and land degradation. This study develops and applies a unified multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to compare water-management risk across three structurally different basins: Zhaiyk-Caspian, Shu-Talas, and Balkhash-Alakol. It tests the hypothesis that this risk is determined not only by climatic factors, but equally by structural, institutional, and economic factors. The composite index combines ten indicators in four risk categories (natural-climatic, anthropogenic, economic, and social), weighted by a hybrid of entropy and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) weights from six experts. Among the three basins, Balkhash-Alakol has the lowest relative risk (0.263) under all tested weighting schemes and indicator sets. Within this lower total, the largest contribution comes from industrial and anthropogenic pressure. The Zhaiyk-Caspian (0.484) and Shu-Talas (0.499) basins are comparable in overall risk but differ in their sources: unstable precipitation, water quality, and yield vulnerability in the former, and structural water stress, land degradation, and a rural water access deficit in the latter. Their order reverses at the crossover point α ≈ 0.59: Shu-Talas ranks higher under mostly expert-based weighting, Zhaiyk-Caspian under mostly entropy-based weighting. Thus, the hypothesis is partly confirmed, and differentiated water policy is needed for all basins. By showing which risk category leads in each basin, the framework links water-management risk to the sustainable use of water resources in arid transboundary basins and provides a basin-level basis for monitoring progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals, primarily SDG6. Limitations of the study include the small number of basins, min-max normalization, unweighted regional averaging, and proxy indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182010267
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Resources Management Risks Across Kazakhstan’s Transboundary Basins: A Multi-Criteria Assessment (Zhaiyk-Caspian, Shu-Talas, and Balkhash-Alakol Basins)

А. S. Zhakupova, Nazerke Yermek, Temirlan Blisbekov, Oleg Bordousov et al.
Sustainability
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Water Resources Management Risks Across Kazakhstan’s Transboundary Basins: A Multi-Criteria Assessment (Zhaiyk-Caspian, Shu-Talas, and Balkhash-Alakol Basins)

А. S. Zhakupova, Nazerke Yermek, Temirlan Blisbekov, Oleg Bordousov, Alikhan Medeu
article en

Abstract

Water management in Kazakhstan’s arid basins, which depend on transboundary rivers, faces intense pressure from climate variability, anthropogenic load, and land degradation. This study develops and applies a unified multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to compare water-management risk across three structurally different basins: Zhaiyk-Caspian, Shu-Talas, and Balkhash-Alakol. It tests the hypothesis that this risk is determined not only by climatic factors, but equally by structural, institutional, and economic factors. The composite index combines ten indicators in four risk categories (natural-climatic, anthropogenic, economic, and social), weighted by a hybrid of entropy and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) weights from six experts. Among the three basins, Balkhash-Alakol has the lowest relative risk (0.263) under all tested weighting schemes and indicator sets. Within this lower total, the largest contribution comes from industrial and anthropogenic pressure. The Zhaiyk-Caspian (0.484) and Shu-Talas (0.499) basins are comparable in overall risk but differ in their sources: unstable precipitation, water quality, and yield vulnerability in the former, and structural water stress, land degradation, and a rural water access deficit in the latter. Their order reverses at the crossover point α ≈ 0.59: Shu-Talas ranks higher under mostly expert-based weighting, Zhaiyk-Caspian under mostly entropy-based weighting. Thus, the hypothesis is partly confirmed, and differentiated water policy is needed for all basins. By showing which risk category leads in each basin, the framework links water-management risk to the sustainable use of water resources in arid transboundary basins and provides a basin-level basis for monitoring progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals, primarily SDG6. Limitations of the study include the small number of basins, min-max normalization, unweighted regional averaging, and proxy indicators.

SustainabilityVol. 18(20)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), Institute of Geography (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.