A Novel Taxonomy of Contextual Connection and Linguistic Dependency Developed for User Engagement with a Healthcare AI Chatbot

In AI–human conversations, engagement emerges through exchanges between users and AI, where each prompt may relate contextually and linguistically to prior turns. This study introduces a user prompt–AI response–user prompt (UP-AIR-UP) triad approach to examine these relationships and proposes a two-level taxonomy. The first level captures contextual connections between prompts (topic shift, prompt-to-prompt, prompt-to-AI response, and integrative prompts), while the second level assesses linguistic dependency (dependent vs. independent). Using data from healthcare chatbot interactions (106 prompts), results show that only 28% of prompts reflected contextual connections to AI responses or integrative behavior, with most prompts being linguistically independent. This pattern may suggest a less interactive mode of conversation, with users often treating chatbots as search tools. Unlike subjective self-report or physiological measures, this approach offers a low-cost, objective way to evaluate user interaction and can support models of user engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261493587
Primary Topic
Speech and dialogue systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Taxonomy of Contextual Connection and Linguistic Dependency Developed for User Engagement with a Healthcare AI Chatbot

Emma Dixon, David M. Neyens, Sara Sadralashrafi
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Speech and dialogue systems
article

A Novel Taxonomy of Contextual Connection and Linguistic Dependency Developed for User Engagement with a Healthcare AI Chatbot

Emma Dixon, David M. Neyens, Sara Sadralashrafi
article en

Abstract

In AI–human conversations, engagement emerges through exchanges between users and AI, where each prompt may relate contextually and linguistically to prior turns. This study introduces a user prompt–AI response–user prompt (UP-AIR-UP) triad approach to examine these relationships and proposes a two-level taxonomy. The first level captures contextual connections between prompts (topic shift, prompt-to-prompt, prompt-to-AI response, and integrative prompts), while the second level assesses linguistic dependency (dependent vs. independent). Using data from healthcare chatbot interactions (106 prompts), results show that only 28% of prompts reflected contextual connections to AI responses or integrative behavior, with most prompts being linguistically independent. This pattern may suggest a less interactive mode of conversation, with users often treating chatbots as search tools. Unlike subjective self-report or physiological measures, this approach offers a low-cost, objective way to evaluate user interaction and can support models of user engagement.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Speech and dialogue systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.