Engagement with and Acceptability of a School-based Relationships and Sexual Health Intervention: Student Perspectives from Trial-nested Qualitative Research in English Secondary Schools
Evidence suggests that school-based relationships and sex education plus school-level actions may be effective in promoting sexual health. We conducted a trial of a relationships and sexual-health intervention in English secondary schools. We draw on nested qualitative research to explore student engagement and acceptability. Twenty-four intervention schools participating in a randomised trial delivered a two-year programme aiming to comprise classroom lessons for year 9 and 10 students (aged 13–15 years), alongside school-level actions (e.g. student-led campaigns and reviews of sexual health services), although implementation fidelity of the latter was poor. We conducted 40 student focus groups across 19 intervention schools and analysed these thematically. Lesson acceptability was high but undermined when teachers appeared uncomfortable, uncommitted or insufficiently knowledgeable. Students valued that class discussions allowed them to express themselves and learn from others, particularly across genders. This was compromised where teachers curtailed dialogue. Boys could feel targeted where they were positioned as responsible for problem behaviours. Awareness of school-level elements was low, but students involved valued these when well-implemented. Although relationships and sex education is now mandatory in schools in England, gaps in provision remain with regard to schools’ capacity to implement good-quality relationships and sex education. Ensuring that statutory relationships and sex education is delivered by staff who are well trained, committed and prepared to foster open, inclusive and critically reflexive conversations is necessary to meet the demands of increasingly complex curricular requirements. ISRCTN registry 16723909.
Authors
- Veena Muraleetharan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5723-1219)
- Catherine Heather Mercer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4220-5034)
- Honor Young (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0664-4002)
- Ruth Ponsford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-0249)
- G. J. Meléndez‐Torres (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-4790)
- Maria Lohan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3525-1283)
- Joanna Sturgess (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-4598)
- Nerissa Tilouche (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-8881)
- Rebecca Meiksin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5096-8576)
- Chris Bonell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-6498)
- Elizabeth Allen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2689-6939)
- Josephine McAllister (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9885-2273)
- Stephen Morris
- Karin Coyle
- Alison Hadley
- Rona Campbell
- Charles Opondo
Institutions
- Hitotsubashi University (JP)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- University of Bedfordshire (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Education Training And Research (US)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Bath (GB)
- Cardiff University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sexuality Research and Social Policy
- Published
- 2026-10-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-026-01428-0
- Primary Topic
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00