Introduction: Reading the Grundrisse today—Totality and contradiction

Marx wrote the Grundrisse in the months after the crash of 1857, and left the notebooks unfinished. This Symposium reads them through two of their organizing concepts: totality and contradiction. In these papers, capital appears as a “moving contradiction” whose moments—production, distribution, exchange, consumption, and the natural and reproductive conditions on which they depend—form a unity that is also a site of conflict. Each locates a point where the logic of capital meets a limit specific to its object, a contradiction it keeps reproducing: nature and social reproduction, the ecological and affective costs of extractivism, fixed capital and dependency, financialization and international subordination, alienation, the totality of production, and species-being under artificial intelligence. Together, these seven papers take the incompleteness of the notebooks as a resource, positing that the questions Marx left open remain ones worth pursuing contemporaneously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205261489695
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction: Reading the Grundrisse today—Totality and contradiction

Vaclav Masek, Sophia Ilyniak, Constanza Filloy, María Emilia Millón
Critical Sociology
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Introduction: Reading the Grundrisse today—Totality and contradiction

Vaclav Masek, Sophia Ilyniak, Constanza Filloy, María Emilia Millón
article en

Abstract

Marx wrote the Grundrisse in the months after the crash of 1857, and left the notebooks unfinished. This Symposium reads them through two of their organizing concepts: totality and contradiction. In these papers, capital appears as a “moving contradiction” whose moments—production, distribution, exchange, consumption, and the natural and reproductive conditions on which they depend—form a unity that is also a site of conflict. Each locates a point where the logic of capital meets a limit specific to its object, a contradiction it keeps reproducing: nature and social reproduction, the ecological and affective costs of extractivism, fixed capital and dependency, financialization and international subordination, alienation, the totality of production, and species-being under artificial intelligence. Together, these seven papers take the incompleteness of the notebooks as a resource, positing that the questions Marx left open remain ones worth pursuing contemporaneously.

Critical Sociology
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), York University (CA), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Villanova University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.