Subjective risk from the side? Investigating cyclists’ perceptions during overtaking maneuvers in a bicycle simulator

Introduction: For cyclists in urban traffic, being overtaken by motorized vehicles is a daily occurrence. This situation can be objectively and subjectively safety–critical, particularly when drivers maintain an insufficient passing distance. It remains unclear which factors in these situations particularly affect cyclists’ perception of safety. This experiment therefore examines how different overtaking distances, vehicle types, overtaking speeds, and cycling infrastructures influence cyclists’ subjective safety in a bicycle simulator. Method: Twenty-eight participants experienced 36 overtaking scenarios in a controlled, simulated environment. They were asked to rate their subjective safety immediately after each overtaking maneuver, while lateral position was continuously recorded. Results: The results showed that passing distance and vehicle type had the largest effects on subjective safety, with small distances and large vans leading to the lowest safety ratings. Overtaking speed and cycling infrastructure also significantly affected subjective safety, but with smaller effect sizes. There were no interactions between the manipulated factors, indicating that they acted additively on cyclists’ safety perception within the tested conditions. Additionally, cyclists showed slight adjustments in their lateral position in response to the overtaking maneuver, moving closer to the curb. Conclusions: Overall, cyclists’ safety perception during overtaking was influenced by multiple additive factors, including vehicle and infrastructure characteristics. The study also showed that cyclists’ perception during overtaking situations could be investigated in a controlled simulator environment. Practical Applications: The findings highlight the importance of legal regulations on passing distances, vehicle types, speed limits, and cycling infrastructures. Targeting even individual factors may already enhance perceived safety. Additionally, simulator-based approaches allow the investigation of other (overtaking) situations that would be too risky or impractical in real traffic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Safety Research
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2026.09.017
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective risk from the side? Investigating cyclists’ perceptions during overtaking maneuvers in a bicycle simulator

Mark Vollrath, Frederike Hanna Strelow
Journal of Safety Research
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Subjective risk from the side? Investigating cyclists’ perceptions during overtaking maneuvers in a bicycle simulator

Mark Vollrath, Frederike Hanna Strelow
article en

Abstract

Introduction: For cyclists in urban traffic, being overtaken by motorized vehicles is a daily occurrence. This situation can be objectively and subjectively safety–critical, particularly when drivers maintain an insufficient passing distance. It remains unclear which factors in these situations particularly affect cyclists’ perception of safety. This experiment therefore examines how different overtaking distances, vehicle types, overtaking speeds, and cycling infrastructures influence cyclists’ subjective safety in a bicycle simulator. Method: Twenty-eight participants experienced 36 overtaking scenarios in a controlled, simulated environment. They were asked to rate their subjective safety immediately after each overtaking maneuver, while lateral position was continuously recorded. Results: The results showed that passing distance and vehicle type had the largest effects on subjective safety, with small distances and large vans leading to the lowest safety ratings. Overtaking speed and cycling infrastructure also significantly affected subjective safety, but with smaller effect sizes. There were no interactions between the manipulated factors, indicating that they acted additively on cyclists’ safety perception within the tested conditions. Additionally, cyclists showed slight adjustments in their lateral position in response to the overtaking maneuver, moving closer to the curb. Conclusions: Overall, cyclists’ safety perception during overtaking was influenced by multiple additive factors, including vehicle and infrastructure characteristics. The study also showed that cyclists’ perception during overtaking situations could be investigated in a controlled simulator environment. Practical Applications: The findings highlight the importance of legal regulations on passing distances, vehicle types, speed limits, and cycling infrastructures. Targeting even individual factors may already enhance perceived safety. Additionally, simulator-based approaches allow the investigation of other (overtaking) situations that would be too risky or impractical in real traffic.

Journal of Safety ResearchVol. 99
Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.