Early Testing of a Mobile App‐Based Intervention to Support Body Weight Awareness and Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial ( BUMP2.0 )

ABSTRACT Aims To assess the feasibility of a mobile app‐based intervention to support gestational weight gain awareness and monitoring. Materials and Methods A total of 157 women aged ≥ 18 years, at < 20 weeks' gestation, were randomised 2:1 to an intervention ( n = 107) or control group ( n = 50), and followed‐up until late pregnancy (34 weeks' gestation to delivery). The intervention was a mobile app encouraging weekly self‐weighing and gestational weight gain tracking, offering feedback relative to Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations and signposting to online resources. The control group received usual antenatal care. Feasibility outcomes assessed retention and app engagement. Weight change and the proportion exceeding the IOM‐recommended upper weekly weight gain rate were also assessed. Intervention participants reported their experiences through open‐ended survey responses and qualitative interviews. Results 106 participants provided follow‐up weight data; a retention rate of 67.5% (95% CI: 59.9 to 74.4). A total of 60.7% (95% CI: 51.3 to 69.5) of intervention participants logged a weight in at least half of their participation weeks, with 63.6% (95% CI: 54.1 to 72.1) spontaneously logging a weight in late pregnancy, meeting progression criteria. Median (IQR) body mass index at entry was 25.8 (23.3–29.6) kg/m 2 . During a median (IQR) of 25.6 (22.3–29.3) weeks in the study, mean (SD) weight gain was 9.2 (5.1) kg in the intervention group and 9.9 (4.0) kg in controls (adjusted between‐group difference: −0.7 kg [95% CI: −2.5 to 1.2]), with 63.4% (95% CI: 51.8 to 73.6) of intervention and 60.0% (95% CI: 43.6 to 74.5) of control participants exceeding the IOM‐recommended weekly weight gain rate. Most intervention participants valued weight tracking and the app's ease of use, but some reported anxiety and wanted more detailed guidance and support for weight management. Conclusions App‐supported regular self‐weighing during pregnancy met the pre‐specified progression criteria and was generally acceptable to participants. Exploratory analyses showed no significant between‐group differences in gestational weight gain, though the magnitude was noticeable for such a low‐intensity intervention. Interviews with women highlighted opportunities for improvements through more personalised feedback and support. Trial Registration NCT06882837

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71426
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Testing of a Mobile App‐Based Intervention to Support Body Weight Awareness and Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial ( BUMP2.0 )

Nerys M. Astbury, Moscho Michalopoulou, Susan A. Jebb, Stella J. P. Haffner et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Early Testing of a Mobile App‐Based Intervention to Support Body Weight Awareness and Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial ( BUMP2.0 )

Nerys M. Astbury, Moscho Michalopoulou, Susan A. Jebb, Stella J. P. Haffner, Lucy MacKillop, Yuan Chi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims To assess the feasibility of a mobile app‐based intervention to support gestational weight gain awareness and monitoring. Materials and Methods A total of 157 women aged ≥ 18 years, at < 20 weeks' gestation, were randomised 2:1 to an intervention ( n = 107) or control group ( n = 50), and followed‐up until late pregnancy (34 weeks' gestation to delivery). The intervention was a mobile app encouraging weekly self‐weighing and gestational weight gain tracking, offering feedback relative to Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations and signposting to online resources. The control group received usual antenatal care. Feasibility outcomes assessed retention and app engagement. Weight change and the proportion exceeding the IOM‐recommended upper weekly weight gain rate were also assessed. Intervention participants reported their experiences through open‐ended survey responses and qualitative interviews. Results 106 participants provided follow‐up weight data; a retention rate of 67.5% (95% CI: 59.9 to 74.4). A total of 60.7% (95% CI: 51.3 to 69.5) of intervention participants logged a weight in at least half of their participation weeks, with 63.6% (95% CI: 54.1 to 72.1) spontaneously logging a weight in late pregnancy, meeting progression criteria. Median (IQR) body mass index at entry was 25.8 (23.3–29.6) kg/m 2 . During a median (IQR) of 25.6 (22.3–29.3) weeks in the study, mean (SD) weight gain was 9.2 (5.1) kg in the intervention group and 9.9 (4.0) kg in controls (adjusted between‐group difference: −0.7 kg [95% CI: −2.5 to 1.2]), with 63.4% (95% CI: 51.8 to 73.6) of intervention and 60.0% (95% CI: 43.6 to 74.5) of control participants exceeding the IOM‐recommended weekly weight gain rate. Most intervention participants valued weight tracking and the app's ease of use, but some reported anxiety and wanted more detailed guidance and support for weight management. Conclusions App‐supported regular self‐weighing during pregnancy met the pre‐specified progression criteria and was generally acceptable to participants. Exploratory analyses showed no significant between‐group differences in gestational weight gain, though the magnitude was noticeable for such a low‐intensity intervention. Interviews with women highlighted opportunities for improvements through more personalised feedback and support. Trial Registration NCT06882837

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.