Development and evaluation of a knowledge transfer scheme-based foot core training program for male amateur football players

Lower extremity injuries are common among amateur football players, resulting in reduced performance and a prolonged absence from the sport. While most injury prevention programmes focus on the knee, hip and trunk, comparatively little attention has been given to multimodal foot–ankle and lower-limb training programmes incorporating the foot core framework. This study aimed to develop a foot core-based training programme using the Knowledge Transfer Scheme (KTS) and evaluate changes in lower extremity performance outcomes in male amateur football players compared with a control group. This study employed a two-phase design based on the KTS. In the first phase, a six-week foot core-based training programme was developed through expert consultation and a structured evidence synthesis conducted specifically to support intervention development. In the second phase, male amateur football players were allocated to a foot core training group (FCTG; n = 34) or a control group (CG; n = 47) according to their own voluntary choice of training arm. All participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments, which included vertical and horizontal jump tests, 10-, 20- and 30-metre sprint tests, the 505 agility test, the Y-Balance test and the navicular drop test. In the FCTG, vertical jump performance increased by 8.55% from baseline (time × group interaction: p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.350), horizontal jump performance increased by 3.8% ( p = 0.049, partial η² = 0.048), and right navicular drop decreased by 15.44% (13.19% on the left; p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.513). Significant time × group interactions were also observed for Y-Balance Test scores ( p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.439) and for all sprint distances (10, 20, and 30 m). Changes in the control group were minimal. Given the quasi-experimental design, these findings should be interpreted with caution and do not establish causality. The multimodal foot core-based training programme was associated with greater pre–post changes in lower-extremity performance outcomes and a greater reduction in navicular drop (an indirect, static measure of medial longitudinal arch behaviour) than routine training alone in male amateur football players. These findings are hypothesis-generating: they do not establish that the programme caused these differences, and randomised controlled trials are needed to test whether such programmes are useful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-02154-1
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and evaluation of a knowledge transfer scheme-based foot core training program for male amateur football players

Ertuğrul Gelen, E. Kara, Kadri Er
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Development and evaluation of a knowledge transfer scheme-based foot core training program for male amateur football players

Ertuğrul Gelen, E. Kara, Kadri Er
article en

Abstract

Lower extremity injuries are common among amateur football players, resulting in reduced performance and a prolonged absence from the sport. While most injury prevention programmes focus on the knee, hip and trunk, comparatively little attention has been given to multimodal foot–ankle and lower-limb training programmes incorporating the foot core framework. This study aimed to develop a foot core-based training programme using the Knowledge Transfer Scheme (KTS) and evaluate changes in lower extremity performance outcomes in male amateur football players compared with a control group. This study employed a two-phase design based on the KTS. In the first phase, a six-week foot core-based training programme was developed through expert consultation and a structured evidence synthesis conducted specifically to support intervention development. In the second phase, male amateur football players were allocated to a foot core training group (FCTG; n = 34) or a control group (CG; n = 47) according to their own voluntary choice of training arm. All participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments, which included vertical and horizontal jump tests, 10-, 20- and 30-metre sprint tests, the 505 agility test, the Y-Balance test and the navicular drop test. In the FCTG, vertical jump performance increased by 8.55% from baseline (time × group interaction: p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.350), horizontal jump performance increased by 3.8% ( p = 0.049, partial η² = 0.048), and right navicular drop decreased by 15.44% (13.19% on the left; p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.513). Significant time × group interactions were also observed for Y-Balance Test scores ( p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.439) and for all sprint distances (10, 20, and 30 m). Changes in the control group were minimal. Given the quasi-experimental design, these findings should be interpreted with caution and do not establish causality. The multimodal foot core-based training programme was associated with greater pre–post changes in lower-extremity performance outcomes and a greater reduction in navicular drop (an indirect, static measure of medial longitudinal arch behaviour) than routine training alone in male amateur football players. These findings are hypothesis-generating: they do not establish that the programme caused these differences, and randomised controlled trials are needed to test whether such programmes are useful.

BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Sakarya University (TR), Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.