Modeling the ‘patient cell:’ performances of proximity and the making of pathological proxies

Abstract Scientists evaluate disease models by their capacity to capture salient features of patients’ pathologies. Molecular scientists widely regard patient‑derived human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) as closer to human disease biology than many other cell models. Yet producing tissue‑specific cells from hiPSC entails deliberate manipulation of their developmental state and properties, raising the question how these cells are engaged as faithful pathological proxies. Drawing on my ethnography of biologists creating cell models to study ciliopathies, I demonstrate that proximity between hiPSC-based ‘patient cells’ and patients’ pathologies is actively produced through practices of modeling the cell. I conceptualize these practices as performances of proximity , describing the conceptual, aspirational, and technical negotiations through which researchers reconfigure cellular properties and the links between donors, cells, and clinical objectives. By examining scientists’ value-making practices in disease modeling as performances of proximity, this study illuminates how hiPSC-based models gain salience in basic research. It also advances theoretical discussions in STS about strategies in disease modeling and the ethical–political stakes of using patient-derived cells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioSocieties
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-026-00400-w
Primary Topic
Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the ‘patient cell:’ performances of proximity and the making of pathological proxies

Timo Roßmann
BioSocieties
Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
article

Modeling the ‘patient cell:’ performances of proximity and the making of pathological proxies

Timo Roßmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scientists evaluate disease models by their capacity to capture salient features of patients’ pathologies. Molecular scientists widely regard patient‑derived human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) as closer to human disease biology than many other cell models. Yet producing tissue‑specific cells from hiPSC entails deliberate manipulation of their developmental state and properties, raising the question how these cells are engaged as faithful pathological proxies. Drawing on my ethnography of biologists creating cell models to study ciliopathies, I demonstrate that proximity between hiPSC-based ‘patient cells’ and patients’ pathologies is actively produced through practices of modeling the cell. I conceptualize these practices as performances of proximity , describing the conceptual, aspirational, and technical negotiations through which researchers reconfigure cellular properties and the links between donors, cells, and clinical objectives. By examining scientists’ value-making practices in disease modeling as performances of proximity, this study illuminates how hiPSC-based models gain salience in basic research. It also advances theoretical discussions in STS about strategies in disease modeling and the ethical–political stakes of using patient-derived cells.

BioSocieties
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.