Competing Risk Prediction of COVID-19 Hospital Mortality with Model Diagnostics and Exploratory Evaluation in Mexico

Background/Objectives: We evaluated six-predictor cause-specific models for 45-day in-hospital COVID-19 mortality, including departures from proportional hazards and linearity and transport to Mexican data. Methods: The oxygenation-expanded Barcelona cohort included 1622 adults. Recorded arterial PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) was preferred; otherwise P/F was derived from documented saturation and inspired oxygen using the Rice relationship at SpO2 ≤ 97%. Linear cause-specific Cox models for death and discharge served as a reference. Quadratic and time-varying extensions were assessed by three repetitions of five-fold cross-validation. Frozen Barcelona models were evaluated in a separate Mexican workbook using reconstructed day-45 outcomes and minimum-oxygenation proxies. Historical supplied scores for 634 patients were analysed separately. Results: Barcelona included 325 day-45 deaths. The reference model had apparent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.822 and bootstrap-corrected AUC 0.820. Proportional hazards (PH) departures persisted within 45 days. Combining quadratic terms and predictor-by-log(1 + time) interactions improved cross-validated AUC from 0.819 to 0.831 and Brier score from 0.12343 to 0.11974, while calibration slope decreased from 0.945 to 0.830. In 171 Mexican records with 12 reconstructed deaths, AUC was 0.967 for the expanded linear model and 0.857 for the combined extension. Excluding one extreme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) record yielded 170 patients, 11 deaths, and AUCs of 0.964 and 0.935, respectively. The combined model predicted 17.8% mortality against 6.5% observed in that subset. Conclusions: Flexible effects improved some internal metrics but did not establish an adequate replacement model. Residual misspecification, extrapolation and incompatible predictor timing limit transportability. The calculator implements the linear reference model; definitive admission-time external validation remains necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16203267
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competing Risk Prediction of COVID-19 Hospital Mortality with Model Diagnostics and Exploratory Evaluation in Mexico

Augusto Rojas-Martı́nez, Hamid Reza Marateb, Manuel Rubio‐Rivas, Reza Rasti et al.
Diagnostics
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Competing Risk Prediction of COVID-19 Hospital Mortality with Model Diagnostics and Exploratory Evaluation in Mexico

Augusto Rojas-Martı́nez, Hamid Reza Marateb, Manuel Rubio‐Rivas, Reza Rasti, Martin Wolkewitz, Zahra Sabzevari
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: We evaluated six-predictor cause-specific models for 45-day in-hospital COVID-19 mortality, including departures from proportional hazards and linearity and transport to Mexican data. Methods: The oxygenation-expanded Barcelona cohort included 1622 adults. Recorded arterial PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) was preferred; otherwise P/F was derived from documented saturation and inspired oxygen using the Rice relationship at SpO2 ≤ 97%. Linear cause-specific Cox models for death and discharge served as a reference. Quadratic and time-varying extensions were assessed by three repetitions of five-fold cross-validation. Frozen Barcelona models were evaluated in a separate Mexican workbook using reconstructed day-45 outcomes and minimum-oxygenation proxies. Historical supplied scores for 634 patients were analysed separately. Results: Barcelona included 325 day-45 deaths. The reference model had apparent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.822 and bootstrap-corrected AUC 0.820. Proportional hazards (PH) departures persisted within 45 days. Combining quadratic terms and predictor-by-log(1 + time) interactions improved cross-validated AUC from 0.819 to 0.831 and Brier score from 0.12343 to 0.11974, while calibration slope decreased from 0.945 to 0.830. In 171 Mexican records with 12 reconstructed deaths, AUC was 0.967 for the expanded linear model and 0.857 for the combined extension. Excluding one extreme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) record yielded 170 patients, 11 deaths, and AUCs of 0.964 and 0.935, respectively. The combined model predicted 17.8% mortality against 6.5% observed in that subset. Conclusions: Flexible effects improved some internal metrics but did not establish an adequate replacement model. Residual misspecification, extrapolation and incompatible predictor timing limit transportability. The calculator implements the linear reference model; definitive admission-time external validation remains necessary.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(20)
University of Freiburg (DE), Duke University (US), University of Isfahan (IR), Hospital General de Catalunya (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.