Establishing a transdiagnostic dimension of early childhood depressive symptoms using the Preschool Feelings Checklist‐Scale

Abstract Background Young child depressive symptoms are associated with various concurrent and future psychiatric problems, indicating early transdiagnostic risk for psychopathology. We now need studies that identify and test the robustness, reliability, and validity of early emerging depressive symptom dimensions, examining them relative to wide‐ranging forms of psychopathology. Psychometric methods are suitable for such investigations. Methods In a sample of 547 young children (ages 3–7 years) enriched for internalizing problems, preregistered analyses on the psychometric properties of the Preschool Feelings Checklist‐Scale (PFC‐S) investigated the robustness and interpretation of young child depressive symptom dimensions using exploratory structural equation models (ESEMs) and correlations alongside related constructs. We also tested the accuracy with which the PFC‐S distinguished children based on broadband psychiatric diagnostic profiles and clinical concern. Results A bifactor ESEM with three group factors (Social and Behavioral Anhedonia, Emotional and Behavioral Dysregulation, and Excessive Guilt and Sadness) and residual correlations accounting for item wording similarities was the most valid PFC‐S model (comparative fit index/Tucker‐Lewis index = 0.98; root mean squared error of approximation = 0.06; standardized root mean squared residual = 0.03). Only the general factor emerged as reliable ( ω H = 0.91; H = 0.96; factor determinacy = 0.99). The general factor evidenced correlations with measures of child anhedonia severity, executive dysfunction, and emotion dysregulation (| r s| > .60) a well as correlations with child reward responsiveness, driven goal pursuit, inhibited behavior, sex assigned at birth, and caregiver depressive symptom severity (0 < | r s| ≤ .37), but was not significantly correlated with child guilt, approach behavior, or fun‐seeking (| r s| ≤ .07). The general factor most accurately distinguished children with multiple co‐occurring diagnoses, including depression, and those with no diagnoses, as well as children with versus without clinical levels of general psychopathology. Conclusion Findings support a PFC‐S general factor characterized by reward and executive dysfunction with both depression‐specific and transdiagnostic psychopathology risk relevance in young children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCPP Advances
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70152
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing a transdiagnostic dimension of early childhood depressive symptoms using the Preschool Feelings Checklist‐Scale

Nicolas Leonardo Camacho, Kirsten Gilbert, Michael Santo Gaffrey, Rebecca Tillman et al.
JCPP Advances
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

Establishing a transdiagnostic dimension of early childhood depressive symptoms using the Preschool Feelings Checklist‐Scale

Nicolas Leonardo Camacho, Kirsten Gilbert, Michael Santo Gaffrey, Rebecca Tillman, Joan L. Luby
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Young child depressive symptoms are associated with various concurrent and future psychiatric problems, indicating early transdiagnostic risk for psychopathology. We now need studies that identify and test the robustness, reliability, and validity of early emerging depressive symptom dimensions, examining them relative to wide‐ranging forms of psychopathology. Psychometric methods are suitable for such investigations. Methods In a sample of 547 young children (ages 3–7 years) enriched for internalizing problems, preregistered analyses on the psychometric properties of the Preschool Feelings Checklist‐Scale (PFC‐S) investigated the robustness and interpretation of young child depressive symptom dimensions using exploratory structural equation models (ESEMs) and correlations alongside related constructs. We also tested the accuracy with which the PFC‐S distinguished children based on broadband psychiatric diagnostic profiles and clinical concern. Results A bifactor ESEM with three group factors (Social and Behavioral Anhedonia, Emotional and Behavioral Dysregulation, and Excessive Guilt and Sadness) and residual correlations accounting for item wording similarities was the most valid PFC‐S model (comparative fit index/Tucker‐Lewis index = 0.98; root mean squared error of approximation = 0.06; standardized root mean squared residual = 0.03). Only the general factor emerged as reliable ( ω H = 0.91; H = 0.96; factor determinacy = 0.99). The general factor evidenced correlations with measures of child anhedonia severity, executive dysfunction, and emotion dysregulation (| r s| > .60) a well as correlations with child reward responsiveness, driven goal pursuit, inhibited behavior, sex assigned at birth, and caregiver depressive symptom severity (0 < | r s| ≤ .37), but was not significantly correlated with child guilt, approach behavior, or fun‐seeking (| r s| ≤ .07). The general factor most accurately distinguished children with multiple co‐occurring diagnoses, including depression, and those with no diagnoses, as well as children with versus without clinical levels of general psychopathology. Conclusion Findings support a PFC‐S general factor characterized by reward and executive dysfunction with both depression‐specific and transdiagnostic psychopathology risk relevance in young children.

JCPP Advances
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (US), Duke University (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.