To Walk or Not? A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Weightbearing on Patient Outcomes Following First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion

Background: First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis is the gold standard surgical treatment of hallux rigidus and severe hallux valgus with osteoarthritis after failed nonoperative management. Despite its common use, postoperative weightbearing protocols vary considerably. To date, no prospective randomised controlled trials have directly compared outcomes between immediate weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) and non-weightbearing (NWB) using modern fixation techniques. This study aimed to evaluate whether immediate WBAT following first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis leads to differences in patient outcomes compared with traditional non-weightbearing protocols. Methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted including 68 patients undergoing isolated first-MTP fusion. Patients were randomly allocated either WBAT or NWB protocols. Standardised surgical technique and fixation (crossed screws or plate) were performed by 2 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons. Primary outcomes were the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM–activities of daily living [ADL] subscale) functional scores, at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included non-union, complications including infection, wound issues, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis used t tests and χ 2 or Fisher exact tests, with significance at P < .05. Results: Sixty-eight patients (33 WBAT, 35 NWB) completed follow-up. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and function at 12 months ( P < .001 for both). No statistically significant differences were found between WBAT and NWB groups in VAS pain scores (2.97 ± 2.215 vs 2.54 ± 2.147; P = .423), FAAM scores (81.31 ± 16.028 vs 85.02 ± 18.863; P = .387), or patient satisfaction (8.00 ± 2.76 vs 8.34 ± 2.52; P = .594). Complication rates were comparable, with 1 case of hardware irritation in each group ( P = .739). Conclusion: Following first-MTP joint fusion, immediate weightbearing is safe and results in similar pain relief, patient satisfaction, and complication rates compared with traditional NWB protocols, although a clinically meaningful functional advantage for NWB could not be excluded. These findings support more permissive postoperative strategies, which may offer benefits for patient mobility, independence, recovery time, and health care resource use that were not directly measured in this trial. Level of Evidence: Level I, randomised controlled trial. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04473196

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle International
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007261481828
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Walk or Not? A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Weightbearing on Patient Outcomes Following First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion

Mark Anthony Glazebrook, Bernard N. Burgesson, Joel G. Morash, Scott D Purdie et al.
1 citations
Foot & Ankle International
Foot and Ankle Surgery
6.70
article

To Walk or Not? A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Weightbearing on Patient Outcomes Following First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion

Mark Anthony Glazebrook, Bernard N. Burgesson, Joel G. Morash, Scott D Purdie, Haley Glazebrook, Ruchith Dissanayake
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis is the gold standard surgical treatment of hallux rigidus and severe hallux valgus with osteoarthritis after failed nonoperative management. Despite its common use, postoperative weightbearing protocols vary considerably. To date, no prospective randomised controlled trials have directly compared outcomes between immediate weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) and non-weightbearing (NWB) using modern fixation techniques. This study aimed to evaluate whether immediate WBAT following first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis leads to differences in patient outcomes compared with traditional non-weightbearing protocols. Methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted including 68 patients undergoing isolated first-MTP fusion. Patients were randomly allocated either WBAT or NWB protocols. Standardised surgical technique and fixation (crossed screws or plate) were performed by 2 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons. Primary outcomes were the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM–activities of daily living [ADL] subscale) functional scores, at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included non-union, complications including infection, wound issues, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis used t tests and χ 2 or Fisher exact tests, with significance at P < .05. Results: Sixty-eight patients (33 WBAT, 35 NWB) completed follow-up. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and function at 12 months ( P < .001 for both). No statistically significant differences were found between WBAT and NWB groups in VAS pain scores (2.97 ± 2.215 vs 2.54 ± 2.147; P = .423), FAAM scores (81.31 ± 16.028 vs 85.02 ± 18.863; P = .387), or patient satisfaction (8.00 ± 2.76 vs 8.34 ± 2.52; P = .594). Complication rates were comparable, with 1 case of hardware irritation in each group ( P = .739). Conclusion: Following first-MTP joint fusion, immediate weightbearing is safe and results in similar pain relief, patient satisfaction, and complication rates compared with traditional NWB protocols, although a clinically meaningful functional advantage for NWB could not be excluded. These findings support more permissive postoperative strategies, which may offer benefits for patient mobility, independence, recovery time, and health care resource use that were not directly measured in this trial. Level of Evidence: Level I, randomised controlled trial. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04473196

Foot & Ankle International
Dalhousie University (CA), Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (CA), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
6.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.