Deep learning–based computer vision for rapid and accurate quantitative field assessment of powdery mildew severity: model comparison, validation, and agreement with human raters

Abstract Quantifying foliar disease severity accurately and reproducibly remains a fundamental challenge in plant pathology, as traditional visual assessment is inherently subjective and prone to rater variability. Although computer vision has enabled automated disease detection, validated end-to-end frameworks that integrate reference generation, model training, and field-deployable percent severity estimation are lacking. Here, we developed and validated a computer vision pipeline for quantifying powdery mildew ( Oidium spp.) severity in pea ( Pisum sativum ) using smartphone-acquired images under field conditions, with tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) powdery mildew serving as a cross-species validation system. A semi-automated multichannel segmentation approach generated continuous percent severity estimates as reproducible training references. Among evaluated deep learning architectures, a YOLO-based model was selected for its superior balance of predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and deployment flexibility and was integrated into PowderyComputerVision, a purpose-built web application enabling real-time inference. Under field conditions, the automated system showed substantially higher agreement with reference severity values than trained human raters (concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), 0.952 vs. 0.513). A linear mixed-effects model revealed that human evaluators produced absolute estimation errors 280.96 times greater than the automated system ( p < 0.0001; 95% CI 120.34–655.91). Performance remained robust across variable lighting conditions, imaging angles, and plant structures, supporting applicability beyond controlled settings. The proposed four-stage pipeline comprising image capture, host and disease classification via YOLOv11m-cls, leaf localization via YOLOv11n-seg, and lesion quantification via multichannel segmentation offers a scalable, objective, and reproducible framework for continuous field-based disease severity estimation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tropical Plant Pathology
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-026-00845-1
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning–based computer vision for rapid and accurate quantitative field assessment of powdery mildew severity: model comparison, validation, and agreement with human raters

Emerson Medeiros Del Ponte, Joaquín Guillermo Ramírez‐Gil, William Fernando Cárdenas-Urrego, Víctor Hugo Aguilar et al.
Tropical Plant Pathology
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

Deep learning–based computer vision for rapid and accurate quantitative field assessment of powdery mildew severity: model comparison, validation, and agreement with human raters

Emerson Medeiros Del Ponte, Joaquín Guillermo Ramírez‐Gil, William Fernando Cárdenas-Urrego, Víctor Hugo Aguilar, Jesus Enrique Flores-Riera
article en

Abstract

Abstract Quantifying foliar disease severity accurately and reproducibly remains a fundamental challenge in plant pathology, as traditional visual assessment is inherently subjective and prone to rater variability. Although computer vision has enabled automated disease detection, validated end-to-end frameworks that integrate reference generation, model training, and field-deployable percent severity estimation are lacking. Here, we developed and validated a computer vision pipeline for quantifying powdery mildew ( Oidium spp.) severity in pea ( Pisum sativum ) using smartphone-acquired images under field conditions, with tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) powdery mildew serving as a cross-species validation system. A semi-automated multichannel segmentation approach generated continuous percent severity estimates as reproducible training references. Among evaluated deep learning architectures, a YOLO-based model was selected for its superior balance of predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and deployment flexibility and was integrated into PowderyComputerVision, a purpose-built web application enabling real-time inference. Under field conditions, the automated system showed substantially higher agreement with reference severity values than trained human raters (concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), 0.952 vs. 0.513). A linear mixed-effects model revealed that human evaluators produced absolute estimation errors 280.96 times greater than the automated system ( p < 0.0001; 95% CI 120.34–655.91). Performance remained robust across variable lighting conditions, imaging angles, and plant structures, supporting applicability beyond controlled settings. The proposed four-stage pipeline comprising image capture, host and disease classification via YOLOv11m-cls, leaf localization via YOLOv11n-seg, and lesion quantification via multichannel segmentation offers a scalable, objective, and reproducible framework for continuous field-based disease severity estimation.

Tropical Plant PathologyVol. 51(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deep learning–based computer vision for rapid and accurate quantitative field assessment of powdery mildew severity: model comparison, validation, and agreement with human raters — Emerson Medeiros Del Ponte, Joaquín Guillermo Ramírez‐Gil, et al. · Tropical Plant Pathology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS