Use of “Non-Traditional” Animal-Assisted Interventions in Children: A Scoping Review

Animal-assisted interventions (AAI) are increasingly used to support pediatric health, education, and psychosocial well-being. While most research has focused on dogs and horses, a growing body of literature has examined the use of other less traditional animal species. This scoping review mapped the existing evidence on non-traditional AAI in children and adolescents. Using a Population–Concept–Context framework, studies involving participants aged ≤18 years and non-traditional AAI were identified and reviewed. Data were extracted on intervention characteristics, animal species, populations, settings, outcomes, and study design. Forty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions involved diverse species, including dolphins, rabbits, guinea pigs, donkeys, goats, cows, cats, fish, reptiles, insects, turtles, giant snails, and elephants. Studies were conducted primarily in schools, therapy centers, farms, hospitals, and residential settings. Common populations included children with autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, developmental disabilities, anxiety, trauma-related experiences, and other health conditions. Outcomes are most frequently related to social communication, emotional well-being, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, cognition, and physical functioning. Although favorable outcomes were frequently reported, the studies varied considerably in design, populations, interventions, and outcome measures. Because the methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were not formally assessed, conclusions regarding the efficacy or effectiveness of non-traditional AAI cannot be drawn from this review. The findings instead characterize the scope and diversity of the existing literature and identify areas for further investigation. The evidence base is characterized by small samples, methodological heterogeneity, and relatively few controlled studies, highlighting the need for more rigorous research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16100160
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of “Non-Traditional” Animal-Assisted Interventions in Children: A Scoping Review

Peggy Gross, Margaret E. Gruen, David C. Dorman, Anika R. Kadumpalli et al.
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Use of “Non-Traditional” Animal-Assisted Interventions in Children: A Scoping Review

Peggy Gross, Margaret E. Gruen, David C. Dorman, Anika R. Kadumpalli, Rebecca J. Harney, Mariam A. Hamad, Navika Mittal
article en

Abstract

Animal-assisted interventions (AAI) are increasingly used to support pediatric health, education, and psychosocial well-being. While most research has focused on dogs and horses, a growing body of literature has examined the use of other less traditional animal species. This scoping review mapped the existing evidence on non-traditional AAI in children and adolescents. Using a Population–Concept–Context framework, studies involving participants aged ≤18 years and non-traditional AAI were identified and reviewed. Data were extracted on intervention characteristics, animal species, populations, settings, outcomes, and study design. Forty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions involved diverse species, including dolphins, rabbits, guinea pigs, donkeys, goats, cows, cats, fish, reptiles, insects, turtles, giant snails, and elephants. Studies were conducted primarily in schools, therapy centers, farms, hospitals, and residential settings. Common populations included children with autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, developmental disabilities, anxiety, trauma-related experiences, and other health conditions. Outcomes are most frequently related to social communication, emotional well-being, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, cognition, and physical functioning. Although favorable outcomes were frequently reported, the studies varied considerably in design, populations, interventions, and outcome measures. Because the methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were not formally assessed, conclusions regarding the efficacy or effectiveness of non-traditional AAI cannot be drawn from this review. The findings instead characterize the scope and diversity of the existing literature and identify areas for further investigation. The evidence base is characterized by small samples, methodological heterogeneity, and relatively few controlled studies, highlighting the need for more rigorous research.

European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and EducationVol. 16(10)
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.