Daily Pain and Activity Interference Trajectories Following Primary Motor Cortex rTMS for Endometriosis-Associated Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study

Pelvic pain may persist despite guideline-concordant endometriosis care. Evidence for primary motor cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (M1-rTMS) in this population is limited. We assessed daily pain and activity interference, treatment delivery and safety after clinically indicated M1-rTMS. A prospective, single-centre observational cohort enrolled women with confirmed endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Ten left M1-rTMS sessions were scheduled over two weeks (10 Hz, 80% resting motor threshold, 1500 pulses/session). Daily diaries recorded pelvic pain and activity interference during pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment days 1–28 and week 8. Changes were estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Forty-two participants were enrolled and 40 initiated treatment; analyses included 37 for pain and 35 for interference. Model-based marginal mean pain decreased from 5.69 to 4.69 (change, −1.00; 95% CI, −1.46 to −0.55; p < 0.001), and interference from 6.03 to 4.63 (change, −1.39; 95% CI, −1.84 to −0.95; p < 0.001). Both remained below pre-treatment at week 8. Ten of 34 evaluable participants achieved ≥30% pain reduction and three achieved ≥50%. Of the 400 planned sessions, 386 were delivered; a total of 33/40 participants attended all ten and 38/40 at least eight. Twenty-eight participants reported 47 treatment-emergent adverse events; one was severe, none was serious, and all were resolved. M1-rTMS was feasible to deliver with high protocol fidelity and acceptable tolerability. Modest reductions in pain and activity interference were observed, although clinically important pain relief occurred in a minority; without a sham, usual-care, or untreated comparator, these changes cannot be attributed causally to rTMS. Controlled trials are required to determine efficacy and optimal dosing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16101686
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Daily Pain and Activity Interference Trajectories Following Primary Motor Cortex rTMS for Endometriosis-Associated Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study

Cristina Beiu, Marius Nicolae Popescu, Simona Săvulescu, Claudiu Căpeţ et al.
Life
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Daily Pain and Activity Interference Trajectories Following Primary Motor Cortex rTMS for Endometriosis-Associated Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study

Cristina Beiu, Marius Nicolae Popescu, Simona Săvulescu, Claudiu Căpeţ, George-Alexandru Filipescu
article en

Abstract

Pelvic pain may persist despite guideline-concordant endometriosis care. Evidence for primary motor cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (M1-rTMS) in this population is limited. We assessed daily pain and activity interference, treatment delivery and safety after clinically indicated M1-rTMS. A prospective, single-centre observational cohort enrolled women with confirmed endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Ten left M1-rTMS sessions were scheduled over two weeks (10 Hz, 80% resting motor threshold, 1500 pulses/session). Daily diaries recorded pelvic pain and activity interference during pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment days 1–28 and week 8. Changes were estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Forty-two participants were enrolled and 40 initiated treatment; analyses included 37 for pain and 35 for interference. Model-based marginal mean pain decreased from 5.69 to 4.69 (change, −1.00; 95% CI, −1.46 to −0.55; p < 0.001), and interference from 6.03 to 4.63 (change, −1.39; 95% CI, −1.84 to −0.95; p < 0.001). Both remained below pre-treatment at week 8. Ten of 34 evaluable participants achieved ≥30% pain reduction and three achieved ≥50%. Of the 400 planned sessions, 386 were delivered; a total of 33/40 participants attended all ten and 38/40 at least eight. Twenty-eight participants reported 47 treatment-emergent adverse events; one was severe, none was serious, and all were resolved. M1-rTMS was feasible to deliver with high protocol fidelity and acceptable tolerability. Modest reductions in pain and activity interference were observed, although clinically important pain relief occurred in a minority; without a sham, usual-care, or untreated comparator, these changes cannot be attributed causally to rTMS. Controlled trials are required to determine efficacy and optimal dosing.

LifeVol. 16(10)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Emergency University (US), Spitalul Universitar de Urgență Elias (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.