Who speaks up? Voice and community belonging in Australian local government

Much has been written about the value of responding to community voice, yet we know far less about who expresses that voice. Using a nationally representative dataset of 65,336 observations, we analyse the association between direct local political voice and individual characteristics, distinguishing occasional from frequent engagement. Occasional voice is relatively common, but sustained participation is rare. Consistent with theory, educational attainment and community belonging are positively associated with speaking up. Unemployment is also positively associated with voice, while gender differences emerge across the models. We further observe a marked reduction in voice in 2022, a period marked by COVID-19. Overall, around one-third of citizens voice opinions, but participation is concentrated among specific groups. These patterns matter because many promised benefits of participation depend not merely on whether citizens speak, but on who speaks. We conclude by outlining implications for practitioners seeking broader and more equitable engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Local Government Studies
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2026.2746472
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who speaks up? Voice and community belonging in Australian local government

Michael Alexander Kortt, Luan Vinícius Bernardelli, Joseph Drew
Local Government Studies
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Who speaks up? Voice and community belonging in Australian local government

Michael Alexander Kortt, Luan Vinícius Bernardelli, Joseph Drew
article en

Abstract

Much has been written about the value of responding to community voice, yet we know far less about who expresses that voice. Using a nationally representative dataset of 65,336 observations, we analyse the association between direct local political voice and individual characteristics, distinguishing occasional from frequent engagement. Occasional voice is relatively common, but sustained participation is rare. Consistent with theory, educational attainment and community belonging are positively associated with speaking up. Unemployment is also positively associated with voice, while gender differences emerge across the models. We further observe a marked reduction in voice in 2022, a period marked by COVID-19. Overall, around one-third of citizens voice opinions, but participation is concentrated among specific groups. These patterns matter because many promised benefits of participation depend not merely on whether citizens speak, but on who speaks. We conclude by outlining implications for practitioners seeking broader and more equitable engagement.

Local Government Studies
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), University of New England (US), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR), University of New England (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.