Selective universalism in Gulf social protection: a model family analysis of citizenship stratification in Qatar and Saudi Arabia

Abstract Gulf Cooperation Council welfare states remain absent from comparative welfare regime typologies, although they combine high social expenditure with extreme within-country stratification along citizenship lines. This paper applies the Model Family Approach to Qatar and Saudi Arabia, drawing on original programme-level data collected through the Minimum Income Protection Data Collection Template. Income packages are constructed for citizen and non-citizen households across five family profiles and four earnings levels. The protocol is extended with Monte Carlo simulation ( N = 10,000), Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition of a new Citizenship Welfare Gap indicator, Theil index decomposition and principal component analysis with hierarchical clustering. For families with children, the Citizenship Welfare Gap reaches 174 percentage points of the poverty line in Qatar and 111 in Saudi Arabia. Decomposition attributes 77.2 per cent of the Qatar gap to policy exclusion, whereas 66.0 per cent of the Saudi gap reflects cost-burden differentials. Cluster analysis positions Gulf systems in a separate regime space, distinct from social democratic, conservative-corporatist and productivist groupings. The findings supply programme-level evidence for a candidate regime category, the selective-universalist rentier configuration, offered as a hypothesis for testing across the full Gulf Cooperation Council rather than as a settled classification..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Policy
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279426101676
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selective universalism in Gulf social protection: a model family analysis of citizenship stratification in Qatar and Saudi Arabia

Anis Ben Brik
Journal of Social Policy
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Selective universalism in Gulf social protection: a model family analysis of citizenship stratification in Qatar and Saudi Arabia

Anis Ben Brik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Gulf Cooperation Council welfare states remain absent from comparative welfare regime typologies, although they combine high social expenditure with extreme within-country stratification along citizenship lines. This paper applies the Model Family Approach to Qatar and Saudi Arabia, drawing on original programme-level data collected through the Minimum Income Protection Data Collection Template. Income packages are constructed for citizen and non-citizen households across five family profiles and four earnings levels. The protocol is extended with Monte Carlo simulation ( N = 10,000), Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition of a new Citizenship Welfare Gap indicator, Theil index decomposition and principal component analysis with hierarchical clustering. For families with children, the Citizenship Welfare Gap reaches 174 percentage points of the poverty line in Qatar and 111 in Saudi Arabia. Decomposition attributes 77.2 per cent of the Qatar gap to policy exclusion, whereas 66.0 per cent of the Saudi gap reflects cost-burden differentials. Cluster analysis positions Gulf systems in a separate regime space, distinct from social democratic, conservative-corporatist and productivist groupings. The findings supply programme-level evidence for a candidate regime category, the selective-universalist rentier configuration, offered as a hypothesis for testing across the full Gulf Cooperation Council rather than as a settled classification..

Journal of Social Policy
Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.