Predicting Underweight Status in Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate in 10 US Children's Hospitals

ObjectiveTo develop and compare models predicting which infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) will be underweight at 4 months, using multicenter electronic health record data.DesignUsing data from birth to 3 months, we evaluated 63 anthropometric, clinical, healthcare-utilization, and demographic variables across 6 regression and machine-learning models to identify the strongest predictors of underweight status, overall and by cleft type.SettingTen US children's hospitals in PEDSnet, a national pediatric learning health network, 2009 to 2024.PatientsInfants with CL/P aged 0 to 4.5 months.Main Outcome MeasureUnderweight status at 4 months (range 3.5-4.5), defined as weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) < -2.ResultsAmong 5717 infants with CL/P (19% cleft lip, 35% cleft lip and palate, 46% cleft palate), 25.9% were underweight at 4 months. The strongest predictors were early (0-3 months) growth measures: mean WAZ (58% of predictive value), WAZ velocity, mean length-for-age z-score (LAZ), and LAZ velocity, plus the Child Opportunity Index (a neighborhood socioeconomic measure; ∼2%). These 5 predictors accounted for >85% of predictive value in every cleft type. All 6 models discriminated similarly (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.87-0.90); GPBoost, which also accounts for hospital differences, produced risk estimates closest to the actual proportion of underweight infants.ConclusionsRoutine early-life growth measures (WAZ, LAZ, and their trajectories), together with neighborhood socioeconomic status, can identify infants with cleft at elevated risk of being underweight before 4 months, helping craniofacial and primary care teams provide timelier feeding and nutrition support and referrals to the highest-risk infants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261494318
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Underweight Status in Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate in 10 US Children's Hospitals

Heather Oliphant, Kiley Bijlani, Vanessa Whyte, Peter Amoako-Yirenkyi et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Predicting Underweight Status in Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate in 10 US Children's Hospitals

Heather Oliphant, Kiley Bijlani, Vanessa Whyte, Peter Amoako-Yirenkyi, Canice E. Crerand, Christy M. McKinney, Donna M. Denno, Carrie L. Heike, K. Wilson-Lewis, Yeraldi Geronimo, Ioanna Ormanidou, Natalie Lyman, Rhona Galera, Waylon Howard, Abraham Owusu Adusei, Oksana Jackson, Christopher Discolo, Nate Pajor, Sarah Vetter
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop and compare models predicting which infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) will be underweight at 4 months, using multicenter electronic health record data.DesignUsing data from birth to 3 months, we evaluated 63 anthropometric, clinical, healthcare-utilization, and demographic variables across 6 regression and machine-learning models to identify the strongest predictors of underweight status, overall and by cleft type.SettingTen US children's hospitals in PEDSnet, a national pediatric learning health network, 2009 to 2024.PatientsInfants with CL/P aged 0 to 4.5 months.Main Outcome MeasureUnderweight status at 4 months (range 3.5-4.5), defined as weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) < -2.ResultsAmong 5717 infants with CL/P (19% cleft lip, 35% cleft lip and palate, 46% cleft palate), 25.9% were underweight at 4 months. The strongest predictors were early (0-3 months) growth measures: mean WAZ (58% of predictive value), WAZ velocity, mean length-for-age z-score (LAZ), and LAZ velocity, plus the Child Opportunity Index (a neighborhood socioeconomic measure; ∼2%). These 5 predictors accounted for >85% of predictive value in every cleft type. All 6 models discriminated similarly (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.87-0.90); GPBoost, which also accounts for hospital differences, produced risk estimates closest to the actual proportion of underweight infants.ConclusionsRoutine early-life growth measures (WAZ, LAZ, and their trajectories), together with neighborhood socioeconomic status, can identify infants with cleft at elevated risk of being underweight before 4 months, helping craniofacial and primary care teams provide timelier feeding and nutrition support and referrals to the highest-risk infants.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Center for Infectious Disease Research (US), Seattle Children's Hospital (US), Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Children's National (US), University of Washington (US), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Nemours Children's Health System (US), Seattle Children's Hospital (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Texas Children's Hospital (US), Seattle Children's Research Institute (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.