Emergency-Care Utilisation During Two Healthcare Crises in South Korea: A Single-Centre Comparison of Calendar-Aligned 32-Week Windows

Background/Objectives: Emergency department (ED) attendance may change differently from subsequent hospital utilisation during healthcare disruptions. We compared two historical crisis episodes within one Korean regional emergency medical centre. Methods: Four calendar-aligned 224-day windows before and after the onset of COVID-19 and the 2024 workforce disruption were analysed using episode-by-phase interactions. Modified Poisson models used patient-and-day two-way clustered variance. Less-conditioned and initial-acuity-conditioned models were compared. Daily counts used calendar-lag autocorrelation-consistent variance. Source-data audits, full-period segmented analyses and alternative-baseline sensitivities were added. Results: The windows included 83,998 visits by 66,096 patients after source-data recoding. The ratio of relative changes was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.78) for daily visits, 1.28 (1.19–1.37) for transfer-in presentation and 1.44 (1.33–1.55) for acuity-conditioned ICU admission. EMS arrival increased more during COVID-19, but the corrected physiological composite showed no clear between-episode contrast. ED-origin ICU admissions/day were 9.24 before and 9.67 during the workforce episode; the primary ratio of incidence rate ratios was 1.13 (1.05–1.22), but the prior-calendar-year sensitivity included the null (1.06, 0.97–1.15). Workforce-period mortality associations differed before and after acuity conditioning, with adjusted risk ratios of 1.28 (1.10–1.49) and 1.06 (0.92–1.22), respectively. Conclusions: Attendance contracted more than ED-origin ICU admission volume during the observed workforce episode. These findings describe utilisation, not measured capacity pressure, and depend partly on baseline and adjustment choices. The contribution is a multidimensional approach to utilisation surveillance, not universal crisis-specific effects or evidence of unchanged survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15207783
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergency-Care Utilisation During Two Healthcare Crises in South Korea: A Single-Centre Comparison of Calendar-Aligned 32-Week Windows

Kang Hyun Lee, Oh Hyun Kim, Chan Park
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Emergency-Care Utilisation During Two Healthcare Crises in South Korea: A Single-Centre Comparison of Calendar-Aligned 32-Week Windows

Kang Hyun Lee, Oh Hyun Kim, Chan Park
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Emergency department (ED) attendance may change differently from subsequent hospital utilisation during healthcare disruptions. We compared two historical crisis episodes within one Korean regional emergency medical centre. Methods: Four calendar-aligned 224-day windows before and after the onset of COVID-19 and the 2024 workforce disruption were analysed using episode-by-phase interactions. Modified Poisson models used patient-and-day two-way clustered variance. Less-conditioned and initial-acuity-conditioned models were compared. Daily counts used calendar-lag autocorrelation-consistent variance. Source-data audits, full-period segmented analyses and alternative-baseline sensitivities were added. Results: The windows included 83,998 visits by 66,096 patients after source-data recoding. The ratio of relative changes was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.78) for daily visits, 1.28 (1.19–1.37) for transfer-in presentation and 1.44 (1.33–1.55) for acuity-conditioned ICU admission. EMS arrival increased more during COVID-19, but the corrected physiological composite showed no clear between-episode contrast. ED-origin ICU admissions/day were 9.24 before and 9.67 during the workforce episode; the primary ratio of incidence rate ratios was 1.13 (1.05–1.22), but the prior-calendar-year sensitivity included the null (1.06, 0.97–1.15). Workforce-period mortality associations differed before and after acuity conditioning, with adjusted risk ratios of 1.28 (1.10–1.49) and 1.06 (0.92–1.22), respectively. Conclusions: Attendance contracted more than ED-origin ICU admission volume during the observed workforce episode. These findings describe utilisation, not measured capacity pressure, and depend partly on baseline and adjustment choices. The contribution is a multidimensional approach to utilisation surveillance, not universal crisis-specific effects or evidence of unchanged survival.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(20)
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.