Researcher-Driven Insights for Human-Agent Teaming Testbeds

Human-Agent Teaming (HAT) is becoming increasingly important as AI systems take on collaborative roles. However, HAT research depends on experimental testbeds to study human-agent teams. This research builds on prior work that cataloged existing HAT testbeds by identifying and characterizing user needs for future HAT testbeds. In this study, nine HAT researchers were interviewed about their experimental design practices and testbed usage. Affinity diagramming was used to identify themes about pain points with existing testbeds and user needs for future testbeds. Participants indicated growing interest in using AI technologies in testbeds, to design experiments or serve as realistic teammates. Participants emphasized the importance of agent-agnostic testbeds that enable integration with external agents. These findings inform requirements for more flexible HAT testbeds that address current limitations and accommodate future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261493596
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Researcher-Driven Insights for Human-Agent Teaming Testbeds

Michael C. Dorneich, Amanda K. Newendorp, Isabelle A. Clement
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Researcher-Driven Insights for Human-Agent Teaming Testbeds

Michael C. Dorneich, Amanda K. Newendorp, Isabelle A. Clement
article en

Abstract

Human-Agent Teaming (HAT) is becoming increasingly important as AI systems take on collaborative roles. However, HAT research depends on experimental testbeds to study human-agent teams. This research builds on prior work that cataloged existing HAT testbeds by identifying and characterizing user needs for future HAT testbeds. In this study, nine HAT researchers were interviewed about their experimental design practices and testbed usage. Affinity diagramming was used to identify themes about pain points with existing testbeds and user needs for future testbeds. Participants indicated growing interest in using AI technologies in testbeds, to design experiments or serve as realistic teammates. Participants emphasized the importance of agent-agnostic testbeds that enable integration with external agents. These findings inform requirements for more flexible HAT testbeds that address current limitations and accommodate future research directions.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Researcher-Driven Insights for Human-Agent Teaming Testbeds — Michael C. Dorneich, Amanda K. Newendorp, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS