Defining the Role of Staging Laparoscopy in the Management of the Gallbladder Cancers: A Single Institution Experience

ABSTRACT Introduction Despite advances in imaging and extensive staging work‐up, occult metastases may still be encountered at laparotomy in patients with apparently resectable gallbladder cancer (GBC), resulting in nontherapeutic surgery. This study evaluates the incremental yield of staging laparoscopy (SL) in detecting radiologically occult metastases in resectable GBC and its role in routine staging. Methods A prospectively maintained database of patients operated for GBC at a high volume institution was analyzed to calculate the diagnostic yield of SL and the percentage of missed metastases by modern imaging analysis but subsequently diagnosed on SL. In the univariate and multivariate logistic regression, the following binary variables were evaluated to identify predictors of metastasis on SL: (i) NACT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) receipt: yes versus no; (ii) serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19‐9) level: > 1000 u/mL versus ≤ 1000 U/mL; (iii) 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 FDG PET/CT) scan result: equivocal versus negative (positive results were excluded from this analysis as they would not have proceeded to SL without additional workup); (iv) clinical stage: locally advanced versus early; (v) incidental GBC: yes versus no; (vi) tumor grade: moderate/poorly differentiated versus well differentiated. Results The SL was incorporated into the diagnostic and management pathway of 330 GBC patients. SL was performed (i) as a staging prior to a planned radical cholecystectomy ( n = 210, 63.6%) and (ii) prior to initiating systemic therapy ( n = 120, 36.4%). The diagnostic yield of SL for detection of metastases over cross‐sectional imaging was 11.5% ( n = 38). Reasons for inoperability on laparotomy were metastatic 16b1 lymph node (LN) ( n = 19, 50%), locally unresectable disease ( n = 15, 39.5%), peritoneal metastasis ( n = 2, 5.3%), and liver metastasis ( n = 2, 5.3%). The reason for locally unresectable disease was right hepatic artery encasement at the porta hepatis. Regression analysis showed that the significant predictors for metastatic disease on SL were equivocal uptake on 18 FDG PET/CT scan ( p = < 0.001) and prior NACT ( p = 0.026). Conclusion SL provides an incremental detection of radiologically occult metastasis in up to 11.5% patients. The study underscores the benefit of SL and suggests that it should be incorporated in the management of all GBC patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70608
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining the Role of Staging Laparoscopy in the Management of the Gallbladder Cancers: A Single Institution Experience

Niket Shah, Shraddha Patkar, Kaival K. Gundavda, Mahesh Goel et al.
World Journal of Surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Defining the Role of Staging Laparoscopy in the Management of the Gallbladder Cancers: A Single Institution Experience

Niket Shah, Shraddha Patkar, Kaival K. Gundavda, Mahesh Goel, Gurudutt P. Varty
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Despite advances in imaging and extensive staging work‐up, occult metastases may still be encountered at laparotomy in patients with apparently resectable gallbladder cancer (GBC), resulting in nontherapeutic surgery. This study evaluates the incremental yield of staging laparoscopy (SL) in detecting radiologically occult metastases in resectable GBC and its role in routine staging. Methods A prospectively maintained database of patients operated for GBC at a high volume institution was analyzed to calculate the diagnostic yield of SL and the percentage of missed metastases by modern imaging analysis but subsequently diagnosed on SL. In the univariate and multivariate logistic regression, the following binary variables were evaluated to identify predictors of metastasis on SL: (i) NACT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) receipt: yes versus no; (ii) serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19‐9) level: > 1000 u/mL versus ≤ 1000 U/mL; (iii) 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 FDG PET/CT) scan result: equivocal versus negative (positive results were excluded from this analysis as they would not have proceeded to SL without additional workup); (iv) clinical stage: locally advanced versus early; (v) incidental GBC: yes versus no; (vi) tumor grade: moderate/poorly differentiated versus well differentiated. Results The SL was incorporated into the diagnostic and management pathway of 330 GBC patients. SL was performed (i) as a staging prior to a planned radical cholecystectomy ( n = 210, 63.6%) and (ii) prior to initiating systemic therapy ( n = 120, 36.4%). The diagnostic yield of SL for detection of metastases over cross‐sectional imaging was 11.5% ( n = 38). Reasons for inoperability on laparotomy were metastatic 16b1 lymph node (LN) ( n = 19, 50%), locally unresectable disease ( n = 15, 39.5%), peritoneal metastasis ( n = 2, 5.3%), and liver metastasis ( n = 2, 5.3%). The reason for locally unresectable disease was right hepatic artery encasement at the porta hepatis. Regression analysis showed that the significant predictors for metastatic disease on SL were equivocal uptake on 18 FDG PET/CT scan ( p = < 0.001) and prior NACT ( p = 0.026). Conclusion SL provides an incremental detection of radiologically occult metastasis in up to 11.5% patients. The study underscores the benefit of SL and suggests that it should be incorporated in the management of all GBC patients.

World Journal of Surgery
Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.