Real-World Validation of the AI-Enabled Vectorcardiographic CSG-Index for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The VECTOR-CAD Study

Background/Objectives: Cardisiography is an artificial intelligence-enabled resting vectorcardiography (AI-VCG) system, but evidence for its accuracy in coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited. We evaluated the AI-VCG-derived CSG-index for obstructive CAD detection, association with stenosis severity, incremental discrimination beyond clinical variables, and concordance with exercise electrocardiography (ECG). Methods: In this two-centre retrospective diagnostic-accuracy study, 721 Cardisiography records from January 2023–December 2025 were screened and 224 patients were included. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was the primary reference (n = 172); coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) contributed only reference-negative cases (n = 52) to the hierarchical cohort. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis and CSG-index ≥ −0.27 as positive. Primary analysis assessed obstructive CAD discrimination in the ICA cohort; secondary analyses assessed severe CAD (≥70%), hierarchical-cohort performance, stenosis severity, incremental value beyond available clinical variables and exercise ECG concordance. Results: Obstructive CAD was present in 76/172 patients. In the ICA cohort, CSG-index area under the curve (AUC) was 0.820, with 80.3% sensitivity and 78.1% specificity; AUCs were 0.843 in the hierarchical cohort and 0.785 for severe CAD. CSG-index increased across stenosis classes. After adjustment for available clinical variables, it remained independently associated with obstructive CAD and increased model AUC from 0.806 to 0.886. In the exploratory exercise ECG subgroup (n = 83), agreement was 66.3%, with fewer false-positive CSG-index classifications. Conclusions: The locked CSG-index showed balanced performance for obstructive CAD, provided graded information across stenosis classes, and added discrimination beyond available clinical variables. These findings support prospective multicentre evaluation as a complementary non-invasive resting test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16203266
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Validation of the AI-Enabled Vectorcardiographic CSG-Index for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The VECTOR-CAD Study

Halil Gökkuş, Muhammed Esad Çekin
Diagnostics
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Real-World Validation of the AI-Enabled Vectorcardiographic CSG-Index for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The VECTOR-CAD Study

Halil Gökkuş, Muhammed Esad Çekin
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cardisiography is an artificial intelligence-enabled resting vectorcardiography (AI-VCG) system, but evidence for its accuracy in coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited. We evaluated the AI-VCG-derived CSG-index for obstructive CAD detection, association with stenosis severity, incremental discrimination beyond clinical variables, and concordance with exercise electrocardiography (ECG). Methods: In this two-centre retrospective diagnostic-accuracy study, 721 Cardisiography records from January 2023–December 2025 were screened and 224 patients were included. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was the primary reference (n = 172); coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) contributed only reference-negative cases (n = 52) to the hierarchical cohort. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis and CSG-index ≥ −0.27 as positive. Primary analysis assessed obstructive CAD discrimination in the ICA cohort; secondary analyses assessed severe CAD (≥70%), hierarchical-cohort performance, stenosis severity, incremental value beyond available clinical variables and exercise ECG concordance. Results: Obstructive CAD was present in 76/172 patients. In the ICA cohort, CSG-index area under the curve (AUC) was 0.820, with 80.3% sensitivity and 78.1% specificity; AUCs were 0.843 in the hierarchical cohort and 0.785 for severe CAD. CSG-index increased across stenosis classes. After adjustment for available clinical variables, it remained independently associated with obstructive CAD and increased model AUC from 0.806 to 0.886. In the exploratory exercise ECG subgroup (n = 83), agreement was 66.3%, with fewer false-positive CSG-index classifications. Conclusions: The locked CSG-index showed balanced performance for obstructive CAD, provided graded information across stenosis classes, and added discrimination beyond available clinical variables. These findings support prospective multicentre evaluation as a complementary non-invasive resting test.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(20)
Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real-World Validation of the AI-Enabled Vectorcardiographic CSG-Index for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The VECTOR-CAD Study — Halil Gökkuş, Muhammed Esad Çekin · Diagnostics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS