Integrating experimental paper analysis into traditional ancient book restoration: A case study of the Chinese medical text Yi Men Pu Du

Background Ancient Chinese books represent irreplaceable cultural heritage, yet many suffer severe deterioration from acidification, insect damage, and mechanical degradation. Traditional restoration practices rely heavily on empirical experience, with limited integration of scientific testing. This study demonstrates how systematic experimental paper analysis can be embedded into the traditional restoration workflow of a critically damaged ancient Chinese medical book. Methods The ancient medical text Yi Men Pu Du (1739), classified as Grade 1 (critical) damage under Chinese heritage conservation standards, underwent comprehensive paper characterization before, during, and after restoration. Fiber composition was identified by optical microscopy (GB/T 4688–2020). Physical properties—grammage (ISO 536:2012), thickness (GB/T 451.3-2008), and tensile strength (GB/T 22898–2008)—were measured for both original and repair papers. Surface and cold-extraction pH were determined (GB/T 13528–2015; GB/T 1545–2008). A Ca(OH) 2 deacidification protocol (1 g:200 ml) was applied in three successive stages. Results Fiber analysis revealed 100% bark fiber in the cover and 100% bamboo fiber in the text leaves, directly guiding repair paper selection. Pre-restoration surface pH ranged from 5.1 to 5.4, confirming severe acidification. Progressive deacidification raised pH to 7.4–7.7. Thickness monitoring identified excessive post-restoration thickness (195 μm) caused by overly concentrated pulp, which was resolved by reducing the pulp ratio from 5 g/400 ml to 0.5 g/400 ml. Bamboo repair paper exhibited 29.95%–36.66% higher longitudinal tensile strength than bark papers. Conclusion Systematic experimental analysis transformed an experience-based restoration into an evidence-based practice, providing quantitative guidance for material selection, deacidification, and process optimization. This methodological framework is transferable to other ancient book conservation projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360242
Primary Topic
Conservation Techniques and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating experimental paper analysis into traditional ancient book restoration: A case study of the Chinese medical text Yi Men Pu Du

Meng Li, Sijia Gao, Chen Li
PLoS ONE
Conservation Techniques and Studies
article

Integrating experimental paper analysis into traditional ancient book restoration: A case study of the Chinese medical text Yi Men Pu Du

Meng Li, Sijia Gao, Chen Li
article en

Abstract

Background Ancient Chinese books represent irreplaceable cultural heritage, yet many suffer severe deterioration from acidification, insect damage, and mechanical degradation. Traditional restoration practices rely heavily on empirical experience, with limited integration of scientific testing. This study demonstrates how systematic experimental paper analysis can be embedded into the traditional restoration workflow of a critically damaged ancient Chinese medical book. Methods The ancient medical text Yi Men Pu Du (1739), classified as Grade 1 (critical) damage under Chinese heritage conservation standards, underwent comprehensive paper characterization before, during, and after restoration. Fiber composition was identified by optical microscopy (GB/T 4688–2020). Physical properties—grammage (ISO 536:2012), thickness (GB/T 451.3-2008), and tensile strength (GB/T 22898–2008)—were measured for both original and repair papers. Surface and cold-extraction pH were determined (GB/T 13528–2015; GB/T 1545–2008). A Ca(OH) 2 deacidification protocol (1 g:200 ml) was applied in three successive stages. Results Fiber analysis revealed 100% bark fiber in the cover and 100% bamboo fiber in the text leaves, directly guiding repair paper selection. Pre-restoration surface pH ranged from 5.1 to 5.4, confirming severe acidification. Progressive deacidification raised pH to 7.4–7.7. Thickness monitoring identified excessive post-restoration thickness (195 μm) caused by overly concentrated pulp, which was resolved by reducing the pulp ratio from 5 g/400 ml to 0.5 g/400 ml. Bamboo repair paper exhibited 29.95%–36.66% higher longitudinal tensile strength than bark papers. Conclusion Systematic experimental analysis transformed an experience-based restoration into an evidence-based practice, providing quantitative guidance for material selection, deacidification, and process optimization. This methodological framework is transferable to other ancient book conservation projects.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conservation Techniques and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.