Non-Physician Areas in Japan: Typological Classification Based on Regional Demographic Characteristics

Abstract Background Across Japan, there are “non-physician areas” where medical institutions are not present and health care access is difficult. Although these areas are defined as a single administrative category, they may vary according to regional demographic characteristics. Understanding this possible heterogeneity may be important for developing more context-sensitive strategies to improve health care accessibility. Objective This study examined whether non-physician areas can be classified based on regional demographic characteristics using an unsupervised machine learning model. Methods A total of 590 non-physician areas were identified from the national survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (2019). Data on regional demographic characteristics were also obtained. After z score standardization, k-means clustering was used for classification. The optimal number of clusters was determined using silhouette scores. The data on non-physician areas were divided into training (354/590, 60.0% areas) and validation (236/590, 40.0% areas) datasets. The reproducibility of the cluster structure was evaluated using Jensen-Shannon distance and chi-square tests, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to examine the overall structure of the clusters. Results The optimal number of clusters was 3 (silhouette score=0.266), indicating that non-physician areas could be classified into 3 types. The cluster distributions of the training and validation datasets were consistent (Jensen-Shannon distance=0.017; P =.76), supporting the reproducibility of the cluster structure. The PCA suggested that differences among non-physician areas could be interpreted along 2 axes, including population age structure and settlement size. The 3 clusters represented younger, intermediate, and older types, characterized by differences in demographic and settlement characteristics. Conclusions The present study demonstrated that administratively defined non-physician areas in Japan are not uniform and can be classified into 3 demographically distinct types. The typology may provide a framework for understanding differences not captured by the current administrative designation and for considering more context-sensitive health care strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/101570
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Physician Areas in Japan: Typological Classification Based on Regional Demographic Characteristics

Kazuhiko Kotani, Takashi Kuwayama
JMIR Formative Research
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Non-Physician Areas in Japan: Typological Classification Based on Regional Demographic Characteristics

Kazuhiko Kotani, Takashi Kuwayama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Across Japan, there are “non-physician areas” where medical institutions are not present and health care access is difficult. Although these areas are defined as a single administrative category, they may vary according to regional demographic characteristics. Understanding this possible heterogeneity may be important for developing more context-sensitive strategies to improve health care accessibility. Objective This study examined whether non-physician areas can be classified based on regional demographic characteristics using an unsupervised machine learning model. Methods A total of 590 non-physician areas were identified from the national survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (2019). Data on regional demographic characteristics were also obtained. After z score standardization, k-means clustering was used for classification. The optimal number of clusters was determined using silhouette scores. The data on non-physician areas were divided into training (354/590, 60.0% areas) and validation (236/590, 40.0% areas) datasets. The reproducibility of the cluster structure was evaluated using Jensen-Shannon distance and chi-square tests, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to examine the overall structure of the clusters. Results The optimal number of clusters was 3 (silhouette score=0.266), indicating that non-physician areas could be classified into 3 types. The cluster distributions of the training and validation datasets were consistent (Jensen-Shannon distance=0.017; P =.76), supporting the reproducibility of the cluster structure. The PCA suggested that differences among non-physician areas could be interpreted along 2 axes, including population age structure and settlement size. The 3 clusters represented younger, intermediate, and older types, characterized by differences in demographic and settlement characteristics. Conclusions The present study demonstrated that administratively defined non-physician areas in Japan are not uniform and can be classified into 3 demographically distinct types. The typology may provide a framework for understanding differences not captured by the current administrative designation and for considering more context-sensitive health care strategies.

JMIR Formative ResearchVol. 10
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.