Words against walls: Prisoners’ letters, lay penology and exceptional confinement

This article argues that exceptional detention functions as an epistemic regime that governs punishment by restricting prisoners’ capacity to interpret, communicate and contest the conditions and justification of their confinement. Drawing on letters written by political prisoners held in Italian special detention facilities between 1975 and 1986, the study treats correspondence as epistemic artefacts in which testimony becomes a form of analytical reasoning, showing how incarcerated individuals diagnose and theorise the rationalities of punishment under censorship and isolation, both individually and collectively through correspondence. By foregrounding the epistemic dimensions of punishment, the analysis reframes exceptional detention as a struggle over interpretation and credibility, with implications for understanding contemporary forms of emergency penality (the use of exceptional legal measures to govern crime and political dissent) in democratic legal orders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639261494520
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Penology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Words against walls: Prisoners’ letters, lay penology and exceptional confinement

Simone Santorso, Marco Nocente
Social & Legal Studies
Criminal Justice and Penology
article

Words against walls: Prisoners’ letters, lay penology and exceptional confinement

Simone Santorso, Marco Nocente
article en

Abstract

This article argues that exceptional detention functions as an epistemic regime that governs punishment by restricting prisoners’ capacity to interpret, communicate and contest the conditions and justification of their confinement. Drawing on letters written by political prisoners held in Italian special detention facilities between 1975 and 1986, the study treats correspondence as epistemic artefacts in which testimony becomes a form of analytical reasoning, showing how incarcerated individuals diagnose and theorise the rationalities of punishment under censorship and isolation, both individually and collectively through correspondence. By foregrounding the epistemic dimensions of punishment, the analysis reframes exceptional detention as a struggle over interpretation and credibility, with implications for understanding contemporary forms of emergency penality (the use of exceptional legal measures to govern crime and political dissent) in democratic legal orders.

Social & Legal Studies
University of Sussex (GB), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Penology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Words against walls: Prisoners’ letters, lay penology and exceptional confinement — Simone Santorso, Marco Nocente · Social & Legal Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS