Recognition by design: Territorial legibility and the stratification of sovereign opportunity after empire

This article argues that the postcolonial international order is stratified not only by material power but also by inherited classificatory position. I introduce the concepts of territorial legibility and recognition by design to explain why some colonially governed territories remain visible as plausible candidates for sovereign statehood while others are stabilized as internalized territories or security problems. It establishes the comparative pattern and its consequences for sovereign opportunity. Using a global mapping of non-self-governing and analogous territories since 1945, combined with paired process tracing of East Timor and Kashmir, I show that decolonization exit templates sort territories into unequal positions within a hierarchy of legibility. These positions structure access to international forums, trusteeship mechanisms, and status resolution scripts, thereby conditioning how geopolitical power operates across cases. High-legibility territories retain institutional pathways to referendums and supervised transitions, whereas low-legibility territories confront narrower repertoires centered on bilateral containment and domestic security. Decolonization thus produced an unequal distribution of sovereign opportunity that continues to shape postcolonial political futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Sociology
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809261489960
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognition by design: Territorial legibility and the stratification of sovereign opportunity after empire

Tamanna M. Shah
International Sociology
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Recognition by design: Territorial legibility and the stratification of sovereign opportunity after empire

Tamanna M. Shah
article en

Abstract

This article argues that the postcolonial international order is stratified not only by material power but also by inherited classificatory position. I introduce the concepts of territorial legibility and recognition by design to explain why some colonially governed territories remain visible as plausible candidates for sovereign statehood while others are stabilized as internalized territories or security problems. It establishes the comparative pattern and its consequences for sovereign opportunity. Using a global mapping of non-self-governing and analogous territories since 1945, combined with paired process tracing of East Timor and Kashmir, I show that decolonization exit templates sort territories into unequal positions within a hierarchy of legibility. These positions structure access to international forums, trusteeship mechanisms, and status resolution scripts, thereby conditioning how geopolitical power operates across cases. High-legibility territories retain institutional pathways to referendums and supervised transitions, whereas low-legibility territories confront narrower repertoires centered on bilateral containment and domestic security. Decolonization thus produced an unequal distribution of sovereign opportunity that continues to shape postcolonial political futures.

International Sociology
Ohio University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.