Vascular Phenotyping Across the CKM Syndrome: Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function Testing, Prognostic Value and Clinical Implementation

Cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome represents a continuum of metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular abnormalities in which vascular dysfunction may develop before clinically overt cardiovascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, microvascular abnormalities, and structural vascular damage may therefore provide complementary information regarding vascular injury across CKM stages. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the pathophysiological basis, non-invasive assessment, prognostic value, and clinical implementation of vascular phenotyping across the CKM spectrum, with particular emphasis on arterial stiffness and endothelial function. The principal approaches discussed include carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), peripheral arterial tonometry, microvascular techniques, and structural markers such as coronary artery calcium (CAC) and carotid plaque, considered in the context of contemporary CKM staging and PREVENT-based risk assessment. Among functional vascular measures, cfPWV remains the best-validated non-invasive marker of aortic stiffness and is independently associated with cardiovascular and renal outcomes, whereas FMD provides complementary information on conduit-artery endothelial function but is limited by technical requirements and inconsistent incremental predictive value. Microvascular and glycocalyx-based techniques remain less standardized, while structural phenotyping, particularly CAC and carotid plaque assessment, has stronger evidence for risk reclassification in selected populations. Vascular phenotyping should therefore be regarded as a selective, risk-adapted strategy rather than a universal screening approach. Its greatest potential may lie in integrating vascular measures with CKM stage, PREVENT estimates, kidney and cardiac biomarkers, and structural imaging to identify disproportionate or subclinical vascular injury, particularly during progression from CKM stage 2 to stage 3. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether such multimodal phenotyping improves therapeutic decision-making and cardiovascular and kidney outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16203273
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vascular Phenotyping Across the CKM Syndrome: Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function Testing, Prognostic Value and Clinical Implementation

Teodora Alexescu, Mircea Vasile Milaciu, Angela Cozma, Adela Sitar-Tăut et al.
Diagnostics
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Vascular Phenotyping Across the CKM Syndrome: Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function Testing, Prognostic Value and Clinical Implementation

Teodora Alexescu, Mircea Vasile Milaciu, Angela Cozma, Adela Sitar-Tăut, Mirela-Georgiana Perné, Brînduşa Tiperciuc, Dan Claudiu Măgureanu, George Ciulei, Olga Hilda Orasan, Alexandru Gerdanovics, Cezara-Andreea Gerdanovics, Anamaria-Vlăduța Tomoiagă, Cezar Login, Luiza Maria Hiceag, Paul-Alexandru Milea, Alexandra-Cătălina Andronescu
article en

Abstract

Cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome represents a continuum of metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular abnormalities in which vascular dysfunction may develop before clinically overt cardiovascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, microvascular abnormalities, and structural vascular damage may therefore provide complementary information regarding vascular injury across CKM stages. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the pathophysiological basis, non-invasive assessment, prognostic value, and clinical implementation of vascular phenotyping across the CKM spectrum, with particular emphasis on arterial stiffness and endothelial function. The principal approaches discussed include carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), peripheral arterial tonometry, microvascular techniques, and structural markers such as coronary artery calcium (CAC) and carotid plaque, considered in the context of contemporary CKM staging and PREVENT-based risk assessment. Among functional vascular measures, cfPWV remains the best-validated non-invasive marker of aortic stiffness and is independently associated with cardiovascular and renal outcomes, whereas FMD provides complementary information on conduit-artery endothelial function but is limited by technical requirements and inconsistent incremental predictive value. Microvascular and glycocalyx-based techniques remain less standardized, while structural phenotyping, particularly CAC and carotid plaque assessment, has stronger evidence for risk reclassification in selected populations. Vascular phenotyping should therefore be regarded as a selective, risk-adapted strategy rather than a universal screening approach. Its greatest potential may lie in integrating vascular measures with CKM stage, PREVENT estimates, kidney and cardiac biomarkers, and structural imaging to identify disproportionate or subclinical vascular injury, particularly during progression from CKM stage 2 to stage 3. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether such multimodal phenotyping improves therapeutic decision-making and cardiovascular and kidney outcomes.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(20)
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Arad County Clinical Hospital (RO), Institut supérieur d'étude des religions et de la laïcité (FR), Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta (RO), Aidu Chuo Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.