Regret aversion and anchoring effects in advanced parking information system adoption: The behavioral economics of parking choices

Advanced parking information systems (APISs) aim to alleviate urban parking challenges by providing real-time information and reservations. Their effectiveness, however, depends on how drivers respond to these services when they coexist with uncertain current parking options. This decision process is shaped by psychological mechanisms which standard utility-maximizing models often fail to capture. This study addresses this gap by examining drivers’ APIS choices through an anchored generalized random regret minimization (AG-RRM) model, extended within a latent class framework. By introducing the Self-Report Parking Habit Index (SRPHI), we further quantify the strength of ingrained parking routine and its impact on APIS choices. Results from a stated preference survey reveal parking behavior spans a spectrum from asymmetric regret aversion to linear attribute trade-offs. Familiar current parking serves as a reference anchor associated with stronger regret responses when APIS options underperform. We identify two distinct driver segments based on SRPHI scores. Efficiency-oriented drivers (38.8%) respond rationally to quantifiable APIS benefits. Conversely, habitual or anchor-bound drivers (61.2%) represent the majority, exhibiting stronger regret aversion and anchoring-related responses involving current parking. For the anchor-bound majority, the estimated responses suggest that marginal price signals alone may be insufficient to nudge adoption. These insights provide a behavioral foundation for personalized measures and de-anchoring interventions promoting APIS usage. We suggest APIS operators leverage psychological nudges, such visualizing invisible cruising costs, to weaken the perceived surcharge-free advantage of current parking options. By reframing the mental anchor, such non-monetary interventions have the potential to address behavioral inertia and improve parking efficiencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105301
Primary Topic
Smart Parking Systems Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regret aversion and anchoring effects in advanced parking information system adoption: The behavioral economics of parking choices

Sunghoon Jang, Meng Guo, Doosun Hong, Eunhyang Lee
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Smart Parking Systems Research
article

Regret aversion and anchoring effects in advanced parking information system adoption: The behavioral economics of parking choices

Sunghoon Jang, Meng Guo, Doosun Hong, Eunhyang Lee
article en

Abstract

Advanced parking information systems (APISs) aim to alleviate urban parking challenges by providing real-time information and reservations. Their effectiveness, however, depends on how drivers respond to these services when they coexist with uncertain current parking options. This decision process is shaped by psychological mechanisms which standard utility-maximizing models often fail to capture. This study addresses this gap by examining drivers’ APIS choices through an anchored generalized random regret minimization (AG-RRM) model, extended within a latent class framework. By introducing the Self-Report Parking Habit Index (SRPHI), we further quantify the strength of ingrained parking routine and its impact on APIS choices. Results from a stated preference survey reveal parking behavior spans a spectrum from asymmetric regret aversion to linear attribute trade-offs. Familiar current parking serves as a reference anchor associated with stronger regret responses when APIS options underperform. We identify two distinct driver segments based on SRPHI scores. Efficiency-oriented drivers (38.8%) respond rationally to quantifiable APIS benefits. Conversely, habitual or anchor-bound drivers (61.2%) represent the majority, exhibiting stronger regret aversion and anchoring-related responses involving current parking. For the anchor-bound majority, the estimated responses suggest that marginal price signals alone may be insufficient to nudge adoption. These insights provide a behavioral foundation for personalized measures and de-anchoring interventions promoting APIS usage. We suggest APIS operators leverage psychological nudges, such visualizing invisible cruising costs, to weaken the perceived surcharge-free advantage of current parking options. By reframing the mental anchor, such non-monetary interventions have the potential to address behavioral inertia and improve parking efficiencies.

Transportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeVol. 215
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Smart Parking Systems Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.