Probabilistic Assessment of Carbon Storage Response to Reduction Planning for Sustainable Development in Shanghai: A Coupled Bidirectional CA and MC-InVEST Approach

China’s megacities are increasingly adopting land reduction planning, yet most land cover simulations remain expansion-oriented and InVEST assessments often overlook carbon density uncertainty. To address these limitations, this study developed an integrated framework coupling a bidirectional cellular automata (CA) model with a Monte Carlo-based InVEST (MC-InVEST) approach to evaluate the probabilistic response of Shanghai’s terrestrial carbon storage to simultaneous construction land expansion and reduction. Based on 2000 Monte Carlo iterations, Shanghai’s 2024 carbon storage was estimated at 60.00 Mt (95% UI: 51.09–69.84 Mt). By 2035, mean carbon storage declined to 53.95 Mt (95% UI: 44.07–65.15 Mt) under the Urban Development Priority (UDP) scenario, 56.73 Mt (95% UI: 47.90–66.44 Mt) under the Farmland Protection Priority (FPP) scenario, and 59.16 Mt (95% UI: 49.98–69.11 Mt) under the Ecological Protection Priority (EPP) scenario, respectively. Paired Monte Carlo comparisons showed that EPP retained 5.21 Mt (95% UI: 3.53–6.82 Mt) more carbon than UDP and 2.43 Mt (95% UI: 1.73–3.01 Mt) more than FPP, with both differences remaining positive across all 2000 paired iterations. However, restoration maturity sensitivity analysis substantially reduced the EPP–FPP difference. These results show that the carbon storage consequences of area-balanced construction land expansion and reduction depend on both the land cover types converted and the subsequent restoration pathways. The proposed framework provides an uncertainty-aware basis for evaluating land-sector carbon storage under alternative urban spatial planning strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182010251
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic Assessment of Carbon Storage Response to Reduction Planning for Sustainable Development in Shanghai: A Coupled Bidirectional CA and MC-InVEST Approach

Yukun Gao, Xue Liu, Xin Meng, Jingxian Wei et al.
Sustainability
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Probabilistic Assessment of Carbon Storage Response to Reduction Planning for Sustainable Development in Shanghai: A Coupled Bidirectional CA and MC-InVEST Approach

Yukun Gao, Xue Liu, Xin Meng, Jingxian Wei, Zihao Jin
article en

Abstract

China’s megacities are increasingly adopting land reduction planning, yet most land cover simulations remain expansion-oriented and InVEST assessments often overlook carbon density uncertainty. To address these limitations, this study developed an integrated framework coupling a bidirectional cellular automata (CA) model with a Monte Carlo-based InVEST (MC-InVEST) approach to evaluate the probabilistic response of Shanghai’s terrestrial carbon storage to simultaneous construction land expansion and reduction. Based on 2000 Monte Carlo iterations, Shanghai’s 2024 carbon storage was estimated at 60.00 Mt (95% UI: 51.09–69.84 Mt). By 2035, mean carbon storage declined to 53.95 Mt (95% UI: 44.07–65.15 Mt) under the Urban Development Priority (UDP) scenario, 56.73 Mt (95% UI: 47.90–66.44 Mt) under the Farmland Protection Priority (FPP) scenario, and 59.16 Mt (95% UI: 49.98–69.11 Mt) under the Ecological Protection Priority (EPP) scenario, respectively. Paired Monte Carlo comparisons showed that EPP retained 5.21 Mt (95% UI: 3.53–6.82 Mt) more carbon than UDP and 2.43 Mt (95% UI: 1.73–3.01 Mt) more than FPP, with both differences remaining positive across all 2000 paired iterations. However, restoration maturity sensitivity analysis substantially reduced the EPP–FPP difference. These results show that the carbon storage consequences of area-balanced construction land expansion and reduction depend on both the land cover types converted and the subsequent restoration pathways. The proposed framework provides an uncertainty-aware basis for evaluating land-sector carbon storage under alternative urban spatial planning strategies.

SustainabilityVol. 18(20)
East China Normal University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.