Differential impacts of Colorado River shortage operations on agricultural adaptation and groundwater reliance in Central Arizona

Severe Colorado River reservoir declines triggered mandatory Tier 1 delivery reductions since 2022. The resulting agricultural adaptations and groundwater impacts remain poorly quantified as the reductions fall disproportionately among water users with different delivery priorities. We compared two adjacent irrigation districts in central Arizona with contrasting Central Arizona Project (CAP) delivery priorities: the Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District (MSIDD; low priority) and the Ak-Chin Indian Community (Ak-Chin; senior tribal entitlement). We integrated CubeSat imagery, Random Forest classifications, and OpenET evapotranspiration ( ET ) products within a water accounting framework to quantify changes in cultivated area, crop composition, consumptive water use, and groundwater reliance. Calibrated with historical records, the framework reproduced annual irrigation totals with normalized mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.0% at Ak-Chin and 4.7% at MSIDD. During the shortage period (2022–2024), Ak-Chin maintained > 99% cultivated area and a stable crop portfolio. In contrast, the 98% reduction in CAP deliveries to MSIDD prompted substantial agricultural adjustments, including a 25.9% contraction in cultivated area and a shift from high- to lower-water-use crops, with alfalfa area decreasing by 38.6% and barley area increasing by 112.7%. Ensemble ET decreased by 61.1 hm³ yr⁻¹ (27.4%), with fallowing and crop switching explaining 72% and 24% of the decline, respectively. The 147.5 hm³ yr⁻¹ loss of CAP deliveries was balanced by lower irrigation volumes (73%) and additional groundwater pumping (27%). These results illustrate the role of delivery priority on fallowing, crop substitution, and groundwater use, and demonstrate a transferable framework for monitoring of agricultural adaptation and water use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110842
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential impacts of Colorado River shortage operations on agricultural adaptation and groundwater reliance in Central Arizona

Rasmus Houborg, C. A. Sanchez, Pierre Guillevic, Zhaocheng Wang et al.
Agricultural Water Management
Water resources management and optimization
article

Differential impacts of Colorado River shortage operations on agricultural adaptation and groundwater reliance in Central Arizona

Rasmus Houborg, C. A. Sanchez, Pierre Guillevic, Zhaocheng Wang, Andrew N. French, Enrique R. Vivoni, Sarah Porter, Shraddha Sharma
article en

Abstract

Severe Colorado River reservoir declines triggered mandatory Tier 1 delivery reductions since 2022. The resulting agricultural adaptations and groundwater impacts remain poorly quantified as the reductions fall disproportionately among water users with different delivery priorities. We compared two adjacent irrigation districts in central Arizona with contrasting Central Arizona Project (CAP) delivery priorities: the Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District (MSIDD; low priority) and the Ak-Chin Indian Community (Ak-Chin; senior tribal entitlement). We integrated CubeSat imagery, Random Forest classifications, and OpenET evapotranspiration ( ET ) products within a water accounting framework to quantify changes in cultivated area, crop composition, consumptive water use, and groundwater reliance. Calibrated with historical records, the framework reproduced annual irrigation totals with normalized mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.0% at Ak-Chin and 4.7% at MSIDD. During the shortage period (2022–2024), Ak-Chin maintained > 99% cultivated area and a stable crop portfolio. In contrast, the 98% reduction in CAP deliveries to MSIDD prompted substantial agricultural adjustments, including a 25.9% contraction in cultivated area and a shift from high- to lower-water-use crops, with alfalfa area decreasing by 38.6% and barley area increasing by 112.7%. Ensemble ET decreased by 61.1 hm³ yr⁻¹ (27.4%), with fallowing and crop switching explaining 72% and 24% of the decline, respectively. The 147.5 hm³ yr⁻¹ loss of CAP deliveries was balanced by lower irrigation volumes (73%) and additional groundwater pumping (27%). These results illustrate the role of delivery priority on fallowing, crop substitution, and groundwater use, and demonstrate a transferable framework for monitoring of agricultural adaptation and water use.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 336
University of Arizona (US), Arizona Western College (US), U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (US), Planet Labs PBC (United States) (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.