Social Work as an Institution: Explaining Stability, Change, and Contradictions in the Field

This article argues for the value of studying social work as an institution. The field has long grappled with questions of professional identity and legitimacy. Yet we lack a cohesive understanding of how institutional forces have shaped social work’s development, how the field has reproduced itself over time, and what constrains or enables change in the social work profession. We highlight how institutional theory can help explain stability, change, and contradictions that characterize social work, including how the field is shaped by structures and practices that are produced and reproduced over time. We illustrate how social work functions as an institution by interrogating the micro-macro divide in social work, demonstrating the utility of institutional analysis. We conclude by noting that the use of institutional theory can help social work scholars better understand the field and its challenges, fostering cohesive theoretical connections between frontline, organizational, and societal levels of social work—connections essential for advancing knowledge about social work, distinguishing the discipline’s distinct contributions, and understanding how broader institutional forces shape social work practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Service Review
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/743564
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Work as an Institution: Explaining Stability, Change, and Contradictions in the Field

Matthew Bakko, Theresa Anasti
Social Service Review
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Social Work as an Institution: Explaining Stability, Change, and Contradictions in the Field

Matthew Bakko, Theresa Anasti
article en

Abstract

This article argues for the value of studying social work as an institution. The field has long grappled with questions of professional identity and legitimacy. Yet we lack a cohesive understanding of how institutional forces have shaped social work’s development, how the field has reproduced itself over time, and what constrains or enables change in the social work profession. We highlight how institutional theory can help explain stability, change, and contradictions that characterize social work, including how the field is shaped by structures and practices that are produced and reproduced over time. We illustrate how social work functions as an institution by interrogating the micro-macro divide in social work, demonstrating the utility of institutional analysis. We conclude by noting that the use of institutional theory can help social work scholars better understand the field and its challenges, fostering cohesive theoretical connections between frontline, organizational, and societal levels of social work—connections essential for advancing knowledge about social work, distinguishing the discipline’s distinct contributions, and understanding how broader institutional forces shape social work practice.

Social Service Review
Wayne State University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social Work as an Institution: Explaining Stability, Change, and Contradictions in the Field — Matthew Bakko, Theresa Anasti · Social Service Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS