Elucidating an explanatory model for cancer care management within the urban family physician setting in Iran: a qualitative grounded theory study

Cancer care management requires coordinated and continuous services across prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care pathways. Despite ongoing efforts to strengthen primary healthcare in Iran, an integrated framework explaining how cancer care can be organized within the urban family physician setting remains insufficiently developed. This study aimed to develop an explanatory model for cancer care management within the urban family physician system based on the experiences and perspectives of key healthcare stakeholders. This qualitative study was conducted using a grounded theory approach between 2025 and 2026. Thirty-six stakeholders, including family physicians, clinical specialists, healthcare managers, policymakers, and faculty members, were recruited through purposive sampling followed by theoretical sampling. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews and analyzed using constant comparison and the three stages of grounded theory coding (open, axial, and selective coding) with MAXQDA 2020 software. Theoretical saturation was assessed based on the development and refinement of categories and their conceptual relationships. The rigor of the study was ensured using established qualitative trustworthiness criteria. Analysis resulted in the development of an explanatory model comprising 7 main categories, 18 subcategories, and 122 initial codes. The core category was identified as “Developing integrated and coordinated cancer care within the urban family physician system.” The findings indicated that fragmented governance and unclear stewardship acted as upstream conditions influencing organizational capacity, referral coordination, information integration, and continuity of care. These interconnected mechanisms subsequently shaped challenges across cancer prevention, early detection, treatment coordination, supportive care, and patient engagement. The developed explanatory model highlights that effective cancer care management within the urban family physician system depends on strengthening coordination across healthcare levels rather than addressing isolated service deficiencies. The findings provide evidence-informed insights for improving governance structures, referral pathways, information integration, and continuity of cancer care in primary healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16790-w
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elucidating an explanatory model for cancer care management within the urban family physician setting in Iran: a qualitative grounded theory study

Ghahraman Mahmoudi, JAMSHID YAZDANI-CHARATI, Seyed-Amir Soltani, Mohammad-Ali Jahani
BMC Cancer
Healthcare Systems and Technology
article

Elucidating an explanatory model for cancer care management within the urban family physician setting in Iran: a qualitative grounded theory study

Ghahraman Mahmoudi, JAMSHID YAZDANI-CHARATI, Seyed-Amir Soltani, Mohammad-Ali Jahani
article en

Abstract

Cancer care management requires coordinated and continuous services across prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care pathways. Despite ongoing efforts to strengthen primary healthcare in Iran, an integrated framework explaining how cancer care can be organized within the urban family physician setting remains insufficiently developed. This study aimed to develop an explanatory model for cancer care management within the urban family physician system based on the experiences and perspectives of key healthcare stakeholders. This qualitative study was conducted using a grounded theory approach between 2025 and 2026. Thirty-six stakeholders, including family physicians, clinical specialists, healthcare managers, policymakers, and faculty members, were recruited through purposive sampling followed by theoretical sampling. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews and analyzed using constant comparison and the three stages of grounded theory coding (open, axial, and selective coding) with MAXQDA 2020 software. Theoretical saturation was assessed based on the development and refinement of categories and their conceptual relationships. The rigor of the study was ensured using established qualitative trustworthiness criteria. Analysis resulted in the development of an explanatory model comprising 7 main categories, 18 subcategories, and 122 initial codes. The core category was identified as “Developing integrated and coordinated cancer care within the urban family physician system.” The findings indicated that fragmented governance and unclear stewardship acted as upstream conditions influencing organizational capacity, referral coordination, information integration, and continuity of care. These interconnected mechanisms subsequently shaped challenges across cancer prevention, early detection, treatment coordination, supportive care, and patient engagement. The developed explanatory model highlights that effective cancer care management within the urban family physician system depends on strengthening coordination across healthcare levels rather than addressing isolated service deficiencies. The findings provide evidence-informed insights for improving governance structures, referral pathways, information integration, and continuity of cancer care in primary healthcare settings.

BMC Cancer
Islamic Azad University Sari Branch (IR), Babol University of Medical Sciences (IR), Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.