Better together: Multi‐Agent system teamwork

Abstract While most present‐day multi‐agent system (MAS) deployments involve teams of agents within a single institution orchestrated by one or a few actors, some researchers are already beginning to appreciate the promise of more complex ecosystems consisting of hybrid human‐agent‐robot teams that operate across organizational and geographic boundaries. Importantly, effective teamwork does not emerge merely from making individual agents more capable or from accumulated experience working alongside other agents. Rather, success requires every essential ingredient to be present and planned for; failure requires only one to be missing. In addition to leveraging what is already known about team structure, heterogeneity/diversity, and team processes, research should also account for the diverse task types and forms of interdependence that make up sophisticated, performative joint activity in the real world. Considering the high‐stake opportunities and risks of MAS, a group of researchers from around the world have formed the international Multi‐Agent System Safety and Teamwork (MASST) initiative. Essays in this this AI Magazine special issue on Multi‐Agent System Teamwork—and its companion special issue on Multi‐Agent System Safety and Human‐Centered Agent Interaction—have been selected from the proceedings of past MASST events. In this article, we outline some of the needed requirements for making MAS “better together.” Innovative research relating to these requirements is grouped under four headings: 1. enabling scalable teamwork; 2. assuring multi‐agent alignment; 3. managing the nuanced dynamics of trust and delegation; 4. theory and design of “coordination‐first” systems

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI Magazine
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70100
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Better together: Multi‐Agent system teamwork

Nancy J. Cooke, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Mufti Mahmud, David D. Woods et al.
1 citations
AI Magazine
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
3.72
article

Better together: Multi‐Agent system teamwork

Nancy J. Cooke, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Mufti Mahmud, David D. Woods, Michael A. Goodrich, Matthew Johnson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract While most present‐day multi‐agent system (MAS) deployments involve teams of agents within a single institution orchestrated by one or a few actors, some researchers are already beginning to appreciate the promise of more complex ecosystems consisting of hybrid human‐agent‐robot teams that operate across organizational and geographic boundaries. Importantly, effective teamwork does not emerge merely from making individual agents more capable or from accumulated experience working alongside other agents. Rather, success requires every essential ingredient to be present and planned for; failure requires only one to be missing. In addition to leveraging what is already known about team structure, heterogeneity/diversity, and team processes, research should also account for the diverse task types and forms of interdependence that make up sophisticated, performative joint activity in the real world. Considering the high‐stake opportunities and risks of MAS, a group of researchers from around the world have formed the international Multi‐Agent System Safety and Teamwork (MASST) initiative. Essays in this this AI Magazine special issue on Multi‐Agent System Teamwork—and its companion special issue on Multi‐Agent System Safety and Human‐Centered Agent Interaction—have been selected from the proceedings of past MASST events. In this article, we outline some of the needed requirements for making MAS “better together.” Innovative research relating to these requirements is grouped under four headings: 1. enabling scalable teamwork; 2. assuring multi‐agent alignment; 3. managing the nuanced dynamics of trust and delegation; 4. theory and design of “coordination‐first” systems

AI MagazineVol. 47(4)
Brigham Young University (US), Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), The Ohio State University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
3.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.