Why do people migrate irregularly? Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment in West Africa

Irregular migration to Europe by sea, though risky, remains one of the most popular migration options for many Sub-Saharan Africans. This study examines the drivers of irregular migration decisions using an incentivized lab-in-the-field experiment in rural Gambia, the African country with the highest per-capita rate of irregular migration to Europe. Potential migrants substantially overestimate the probability of dying en route , reporting an average belief of 51 percent compared with a best available estimate of about 20 percent. In the experiment, reducing the probability of dying en route from 50 to 20 percent raises willingness to migrate irregularly by 3.0 percentage points, while reducing the probability of obtaining legal residence from 50 to 30 percent lowers it by 2.1 points. Our results highlight the importance of potential migrants’ prior beliefs in shaping responses to information and suggest that information policies that fail to account for these beliefs may backfire.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economics
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105800
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why do people migrate irregularly? Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment in West Africa

Tijan L. Bah, Cátia Batista
Journal of Public Economics
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Why do people migrate irregularly? Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment in West Africa

Tijan L. Bah, Cátia Batista
article en

Abstract

Irregular migration to Europe by sea, though risky, remains one of the most popular migration options for many Sub-Saharan Africans. This study examines the drivers of irregular migration decisions using an incentivized lab-in-the-field experiment in rural Gambia, the African country with the highest per-capita rate of irregular migration to Europe. Potential migrants substantially overestimate the probability of dying en route , reporting an average belief of 51 percent compared with a best available estimate of about 20 percent. In the experiment, reducing the probability of dying en route from 50 to 20 percent raises willingness to migrate irregularly by 3.0 percentage points, while reducing the probability of obtaining legal residence from 50 to 30 percent lowers it by 2.1 points. Our results highlight the importance of potential migrants’ prior beliefs in shaping responses to information and suggest that information policies that fail to account for these beliefs may backfire.

Journal of Public EconomicsVol. 263
World Bank Group (US), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.