Preoperative Recognition and Management of Mirizzi Syndrome—A Systematic Review of Individual Cases

Background/Objectives: Mirizzi syndrome (MS) alters biliary anatomy, complicating diagnosis and treatment. We characterized diagnostic pathways in reported cases and compared Csendes type I with types II–V. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched through 1 July 2026, supplemented by citation searching. Reports of five or fewer patients were eligible. Patient-level diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data were summarized; groups were compared using Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: We included 133 publications reporting 141 patients. MS was diagnosed preoperatively in 115/138 patients (83.3%). Recognition was more frequent in type I than types II–V (92.5% vs. 76.7%; p = 0.037) and among patients with conventional imaging (94.0% vs. 76.0%; p = 0.014). ERCP use and the number of modalities did not differ by diagnostic status. Compared with type I, types II–V more frequently required bile-duct exploration (37.1% vs. 17.0%), underwent open surgery (43.5% vs. 24.5%), and developed bile leak (24.1% vs. 8.5%) or treatment-related bile-duct injury (24.1% vs. 4.3%). Conclusions: Preoperative recognition was common but less frequent in fistulizing forms. Anatomical classification and conventional imaging may assist operative planning, whereas accumulating modalities showed no diagnostic advantage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Livers
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/livers6050103
Primary Topic
Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Recognition and Management of Mirizzi Syndrome—A Systematic Review of Individual Cases

Rubén Rodrigo Lozano-Salazar, Carlos Chan-Núñez, Nina Méndez‐Domínguez, Osvaldo Huchim-Mendez et al.
Livers
Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
article

Preoperative Recognition and Management of Mirizzi Syndrome—A Systematic Review of Individual Cases

Rubén Rodrigo Lozano-Salazar, Carlos Chan-Núñez, Nina Méndez‐Domínguez, Osvaldo Huchim-Mendez, Adrián Pérez-Navarrete, Edgar Villareal-Jimenez, Macarena Granados-Arjona, Miriam M. Gamboa-Candila, Alejandro Munive-Ramirez
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Mirizzi syndrome (MS) alters biliary anatomy, complicating diagnosis and treatment. We characterized diagnostic pathways in reported cases and compared Csendes type I with types II–V. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched through 1 July 2026, supplemented by citation searching. Reports of five or fewer patients were eligible. Patient-level diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data were summarized; groups were compared using Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: We included 133 publications reporting 141 patients. MS was diagnosed preoperatively in 115/138 patients (83.3%). Recognition was more frequent in type I than types II–V (92.5% vs. 76.7%; p = 0.037) and among patients with conventional imaging (94.0% vs. 76.0%; p = 0.014). ERCP use and the number of modalities did not differ by diagnostic status. Compared with type I, types II–V more frequently required bile-duct exploration (37.1% vs. 17.0%), underwent open surgery (43.5% vs. 24.5%), and developed bile leak (24.1% vs. 8.5%) or treatment-related bile-duct injury (24.1% vs. 4.3%). Conclusions: Preoperative recognition was common but less frequent in fistulizing forms. Anatomical classification and conventional imaging may assist operative planning, whereas accumulating modalities showed no diagnostic advantage.

LiversVol. 6(5)
Mexican Social Security Institute (MX), Anahuac Mayab University (MX), Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX), Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajío (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.