Transport of Low-Energy Ions in Gallium Nitride

The transport of He, O, and Ar ions with energies of 10, 25, 50, and 100 keV in a 500 nm thick gallium nitride layer was investigated by using Monte Carlo simulations. The calculations were performed with SRIM/TRIM and Geant4. Depth profiles of ionizing and non-ionizing energy losses, as well as projected and radial range characteristics, were compared. For He ions, ionizing energy losses dominate over the entire energy range considered, whereas increasing the mass of the incident ion leads to a larger fraction of the energy being transferred to atomic collision cascades. For Ar ions, non-ionizing energy losses exceed ionizing losses up to 100 keV. The mean absolute differences between the Geant4 and SRIM results are 7.81% for the projected range, 17.44% for ionizing energy losses, and 18.54% for non-ionizing energy losses. These results show that reproducing the spatial scale of ion stopping does not necessarily imply an equivalent description of energy partitioning between the electronic and nuclear channels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computation
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation14100240
Primary Topic
Ion-surface interactions and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transport of Low-Energy Ions in Gallium Nitride

Ivan S. Zhidkov, Ivan E. Novoselov
Computation
Ion-surface interactions and analysis
article

Transport of Low-Energy Ions in Gallium Nitride

Ivan S. Zhidkov, Ivan E. Novoselov
article en

Abstract

The transport of He, O, and Ar ions with energies of 10, 25, 50, and 100 keV in a 500 nm thick gallium nitride layer was investigated by using Monte Carlo simulations. The calculations were performed with SRIM/TRIM and Geant4. Depth profiles of ionizing and non-ionizing energy losses, as well as projected and radial range characteristics, were compared. For He ions, ionizing energy losses dominate over the entire energy range considered, whereas increasing the mass of the incident ion leads to a larger fraction of the energy being transferred to atomic collision cascades. For Ar ions, non-ionizing energy losses exceed ionizing losses up to 100 keV. The mean absolute differences between the Geant4 and SRIM results are 7.81% for the projected range, 17.44% for ionizing energy losses, and 18.54% for non-ionizing energy losses. These results show that reproducing the spatial scale of ion stopping does not necessarily imply an equivalent description of energy partitioning between the electronic and nuclear channels.

ComputationVol. 14(10)
Ural Federal University (RU), Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics (RU), Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ion-surface interactions and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transport of Low-Energy Ions in Gallium Nitride — Ivan S. Zhidkov, Ivan E. Novoselov · Computation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS